Cited by 7Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Environmental determinants of round goby invasion refuges at a river scale: implications for conservation of native biodiversity

Open access
Morissette, Olivier, Charette, Cristina, Windle, Matthew J.S., Francis, Abraham, Drouin, Annick, Goldsmit, Jesica, Derry, Alison M.·2024·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Introductions of exotic invasive species are a global disturbance for natural habitats. The severity of invasions can greatly vary from local to global scales, as observed in invasion refuges, which exhibit lower-than-expected invasion intensity. In this study, we analyzed the effects of water conductivity and wetland presence on the density of the round goby ( Neogobius melanostomus) in a large-scale study (>1300 sites), spanning a 400 km stretch of the St. Lawrence River (Canada). Our results showed that round goby density was null in sites with water conductivity under 100 µS cm −1 and increased toward a probable biological optimum at 300 µS cm −1 . The presence of wetlands appeared to also decrease round goby density along the conductivity continuum. Similarly, fish community diversity was maximal outside of the round goby water conductivity optimum. Hence, low water conductivity (<100 µS cm −1 ), in interaction with the presence of wetlands, can provide a refuge for native aquatic species, establishing a simple risk assessment tool for managers. Our results also highlighted the high value of wetland conservation for the conservation of native species biodiversity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cjfas-2023-0171

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 75 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. 10.1371/journal.pone.0106229 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10530-020-02374-7 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jglr.2022.01.017 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/2041-210X.12844 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1007/s10530-011-0146-0 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/edn3.129 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s10530-020-02334-1 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/fwb.13685 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/geb.13701 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1818081116 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0073036 · DOI
  12. Byers J.E., 2002, Conserv. Biol., 16, 630, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01057.x · DOI
  13. Canards Illimités Canada, and ministère de l'Environnement et Lutte contre les changements climatiques, 2021, Cartographie détaillée des milieux humides des secteurs habités du sud du Québec—Données du projet global
  14. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x · DOI
  15. Cerwenka A.F., 2018, Aquat. Invas., 13, 525, 10.3391/ai.2018.13.4.10 · DOI
  16. Cerwenka A.F., 2023, Diversity, 15, 528, 10.3390/d15040528 · DOI
  17. Convention on wetlands, 2021, Global wetlands outlook: special edition 2021
  18. 10.3394/0380-1330(2007)33[303:DORGIC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41559-017-0186 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/ddi.13063 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000942 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/10618600.2019.1629942 · DOI
  23. 10.1023/a:1022133530244 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/tafs.10290 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10530-009-9502-8 · DOI
  26. Hijmans R.J., 2022, terra: spatial data analysis R package
  27. 10.1139/f99-228 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0300-9629(85)90430-x · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s10530-015-0949-5 · DOI
  30. IPBES, 2019, Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
  31. 10.1111/eff.12161 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0380-1330(01)70647-8 · DOI
  33. 10.1525/bio.2010.60.2.7 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/02705060.2018.1483270 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01301.x · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s10530-009-9490-8 · DOI
  37. 10.1139/f2011-139 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/ddi.12001 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s10530-022-02827-1 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/ecs2.1311 · DOI
  41. Lewis M.A., 2016, The mathematics behind biological invasions, 19, 10.1007/978-3-319-32043-4_2 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00594.x · DOI
  43. 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2035:birfup]2.0.co;2 · DOI
  44. 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000397 · DOI
  45. Mayer F.L.J., 1994, Bioavailability: physical, chemical and biological interactions, 256
  46. 10.1007/s10530-022-02816-4 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00987.x · DOI
  48. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2021, Ontario land information (GeoHub)
  49. 10.3391/ai.2018.13.4.08 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s10750-016-2667-0 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s11252-015-0440-1 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.016 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s10530-009-9545-x · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00573.x · DOI
  55. R Core Team, 2021, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  56. 10.1139/f02-099 · DOI
  57. Ressources naturelles Canada, 2016, CanVec
  58. 10.1890/13-0183.1 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1139/er-2020-0088 · DOI
  60. RStudio Team, 2020, RStudio: integrated development for R.
  61. 10.1111/jfb.15412 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1038/ncomms14435 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1073/pnas.1719429115 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.3394/0380-1330(2007)33[154:Aotwfi]2.0.Co;2 · DOI
  66. Sergy G., 2008, Proceedings of the 31st Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program Technical Seminar
  67. 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1002/ecs2.2415 · DOI
  69. 10.1093/biosci/biaa168 · DOI
  70. 10.1002/lno.11029 · DOI
  71. 10.1002/ece3.6364 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.jglr.2008.12.004 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.02.006 · DOI
  74. 10.1007/s10021-016-0102-z · DOI
  75. 10.1016/s0380-1330(98)70803-2 · DOI
  76. Wickham H., 2016, ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis, 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 · DOI
  77. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x · DOI
  78. Wood S.N., 2017, Generalized additive models, 10.1201/9781315370279 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1080/01621459.2016.1180986 · DOI
  80. 10.1890/08-0442.1 · DOI
  81. 10.1002/iroh.200310727 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Morissette, O., Charette, C., Windle, M. J. S., Francis, A., Drouin, A., Goldsmit, J., & Derry, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • St. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences (CA)
  • Clarkson University (US)
  • Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2024-02-01
Volume
81
Issue
2
Pages
190-201
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W4388211201
Cited by
7
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec - Nature et technologies (Bourse de doctorat)
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (Habitat Stewardship Program for Aquatic Species)
  • Ontario Ministry for Natural Resources and Forestry’s Species
  • Trottier Family Foundation
  • Mitacs (Accélération)
  • Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
Neogobius melanostomus, invasive species, water conductivity, wetlands, fish community diversity, native biodiversity conservation, St. Lawrence River, risk assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental determinants of round goby invasion refuges at a river scale: implications for conservation of native biodiversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/cjfas-2023-0171
The paper
Morissette, O., Charette, C., Windle, M. J. S., Francis, A., Drouin, A., Goldsmit, J., & Derry, A. M. (2024). Environmental determinants of round goby invasion refuges at a river scale: implications for conservation of native biodiversity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2023-0171