Population genetics reveal Myotis keenii (Keen’s myotis) and Myotis evotis (long-eared myotis) to be a single species
Open accessAbstract
Recognizing delineations of gene flow among groups of animals can be challenging but is necessary for conservation and management. Of particular importance is the identification of species boundaries. Several physical and genetic traits have been used with mixed success to distinguish Myotis keenii (Merriam, 1895) (Keen’s myotis) and Myotis evotis (H. Allen, 1864) (long-eared myotis), but it is unclear whether species distinction is biologically warranted. We generated 12–14 microsatellite locus genotypes for 275 long-eared Myotis representing four species — M. keenii, M. evotis, Myotis septentrionalis (Trouessart, 1897) (northern myotis), and Myotis thysanodes Miller, 1897 (fringed myotis) — from across northwestern North America and 23 Myotis lucifugus (Le Conte, 1831) (little brown myotis) as the outgroup. Population genetic analyses revealed four well-defined groups (species): M. septentrionalis, M. thysanodes, M. lucifugus, and a single group comprising M. keenii and M. evotis. We document high rates of gene flow within M. evotis/M. keenii. Cytochrome b gene (mtDNA) sequencing failed to resolve morphologically identifiable species. We highlight the importance of geographically thorough investigation of genetic connectivity (nuclear markers) when assessing taxonomic status of closely related groups. We document a morphometric cline within M. evotis/M. keenii that may in part explain earlier analyses that led to the description of the smaller bodied M. keenii (type locality: Haida Gwaii). We conclude that M. keenii does not qualify as a genetic or biological species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many mammal taxa lack sufficient geographic and taxonomic sampling to identify and interpret such hybridization histories (e.g., in the case of M. keenii and M. evotis).
“Many mammal taxa lack sufficient geographic and taxonomic sampling to identify and interpret such hybridization histories (e.g., in the case of M. keenii and M. evotis; Lausen et al. 2019, 2021; Morales et al. 2021; Upham et al. 2022b).”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Lausen et al. 2019
Cites
Evolution of the cytochromeb gene of mammals
Irwin, D. M., Kocher, T. D., & Wilson, A. C. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02515385 · Cited by 2,315 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our initial efforts to sequence the mitochondrial Cyt b gene used primers L15162 and H15915 (Irwin et al. 1991), which amplify a region of ~ 750 base pairs, with some length variation between haplotypes.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Burgin, C. J., Zijlstra, J. S., Becker, M. A., Handika, H., Alston, J. M., Widness, J., Liphardt, S., Huckaby, D. G., & Upham, N. S. (2025) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaf047 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lausen, C. L., Proctor, M., Nagorsen, D. W., Burles, D., Paetkau, D., Harmston, E., Blejwas, K., Govindarajulu, P., & Friis, L.
- Affiliations
- Wildlife Conservation Society Canada (CA)
- Birchdale Ecological Ltd., P.O. Box 606, Kaslo, BC V0G 1M0, Canada.
- Royal British Columbia Museum (CA)
- Parks Canada, Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve and Haida Heritage Site, Queen Charlotte, BC V0T 1S0, Canada.
- Wildlife Genetics International, #200-182 Baker Street, Nelson, BC V1L 4H2, Canada.
- Alaska Department of Fish and Game (US)
- BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, 4th Floor-525 Superior Street, Victoria, BC V8V 0C5, Canada.
- BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (retired).
- Corresponding author
- Friis, Laura
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-279
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W2900179264
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- TSpace (University of Toronto) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game
- Alaska Department of Fish and Game
- Parks Canada
- Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
- Keywords
- Myotis keenii, Myotis evotis, species delimitation, gene flow, microsatellite genotypes, cytochrome b, Myotis septentrionalis, Myotis thysanodes, Myotis lucifugus, bats, taxonomic status, genetic connectivity, northwestern North America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review