The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial distribution of Serengeti wildebeest in relation to resources
Abstract
We investigated the spatial distribution of radio-marked wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) in the Serengeti ecosystem in relation to the distribution of their food resources, comparing patterns in the wet and dry seasons and at local and landscape spatial scales. A mechanistic model of ruminant energy optimization predicted that wildebeest should maximize energy intake on swards 3 cm high and maintain energy balance on swards between 3 and 10 cm high. At the ecosystem scale, wildebeest preferred short and intermediate-height grass of moderate greenness during both the wet and dry seasons. This was consistent with the model prediction which suggests that large-scale movements by wildebeest are motivated, at least partially, by an energy-maximizing strategy. At the local scale, however, wildebeest showed spatial selectivity only on the basis of grass greenness, not on grass height. This differed from model expectations and may have resulted from wildebeest exploiting ephemeral green flushes of grass caused by localized rainfall in their movement radius. According to these results, the influence of other nutritional or behavioural factors on wildebeest distributions is not rejected, yet they suggest the potentially important role of an energy intake maximizing strategy on movement patterns. Our findings show that wildebeest movements are broadly similar to those of other large herbivores that migrate in response to resource gradients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecology of a Grazing Ecosystem: The Serengeti
McNaughton, S. J. (1985) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942578 · Cited by 1,367 · cited 3×
“This suggests that wildebeest were tracking localized rain in the wet season in order to exploit ephemeral green flushes (McNaughton 1985).”
BackgroundThe patterns of rainfall in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania
NORTON‐GRIFFITHS, M., HERLOCKER, D., & PENNYCUICK, L. (1975) · African Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.1975.tb00144.x · Cited by 228
Population regulation of Serengeti Wildebeeest: a test of the food hypothesis
Sinclair, A. R. E., Dublin, H., & Borner, M. (1985) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00379227 · Cited by 160
Self-citation
Cited by
Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement
Owen-Smith, N., Fryxell, J. M., & Merrill, E. H. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0095 · Cited by 398
Self-citationINFLUENCES OF ANTHROPOGENIC RESOURCES ON RACCOON (PROCYON LOTOR) MOVEMENTS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION
Prange, S., Gehrt, S. D., & Wiggers, E. P. (2004) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1644/bos-121 · Cited by 353
SURFACE-WATER CONSTRAINTS ON HERBIVORE FORAGING IN THE KRUGER NATIONAL PARK, SOUTH AFRICA
Redfern, J. V., Grant, R., Biggs, H., & Getz, W. M. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/01-0625 · Cited by 334
Ungulate preference for burned patches reveals strength of fire–grazing interaction
Allred, B. W., Fuhlendorf, S. D., Engle, D. M., & Elmore, R. D. (2011) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.12 · Cited by 313
FEEDBACKS BETWEEN SOIL NUTRIENTS AND LARGE HERBIVORES IN A MANAGED SAVANNA ECOSYSTEM
Augustine, D. J., McNaughton, S. J., & Frank, D. A. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/02-5283 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilmshurst, J., Fryxell, J. M., Farm, B. P., Sinclair, A., & Henschel, C. P.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- NRC Research Press
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1223-1232
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013640412
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial distribution of Serengeti wildebeest in relation to resources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/cjz-77-8-1223
- The paper
- Wilmshurst, J., Fryxell, J. M., Farm, B. P., Sinclair, A., & Henschel, C. P. (1999). Spatial distribution of Serengeti wildebeest in relation to resources. Canadian Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-77-8-1223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.