Cited by 43Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits

Time of metamorphism beneath the Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary thrust zone, Grenville Orogen, Ontario: accretion at 1080 Ma?

Timmermann, H., Jamieson, R. A., Culshaw, N. G., Parrish, R. R.·1997·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

New U–Pb zircon and titanite data from the Muskoka domain, Grenville Province, Ontario, provide protolith and metamorphic ages for the southwestern Central Gneiss Belt. Discordant analyses from a migmatitic orthogneiss and its leucosome form a linear array with an upper intercept age of 1457 ± 6 Ma and a lower intercept age of 1064 ±18 Ma. U–Pb analyses on metamorphic zircon from an amphibolite yield a set of concordant analyses with an average 207 Pb/206 Pb age of 1079 ± 3 Ma. A weakly migmatitic granitoid rock and a transecting charnockitic vein in the immediate footwall of the Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary thrust zone yielded a discordant array of analyses wth an upper intercept age of 1394 ± 13 Ma and a lower intercept age of 1066 ± 8 Ma. The charnockitic vein yielded concordant zircon ages of 1077 ± 2 Ma. The upper intercept ages are interpreted in terms of protolith crystallization, and the concordant and lower intercept ages as Grenviilian high-grade metamorphism and associated anatexis. We have found no evidence for a ca. 1190–1160 Ma metamorphic event in these rocks, as required by some regional tectonic interpretations. We conclude that emplacement of the Central Metasedimentary Belt over the Central Gneiss Belt, which caused high-grade metamorphism in the Muskoka domain, occurred at or shortly before ca. 1080 Ma, and that this marks the time of accretion of the Central Metasedimentary Belt to the southeast margin of Laurentia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e17-084

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Muskoka domain lacks supracrustal rocks or evidence for a polycyclic history, being composed of juvenile Mesoproterozoic (Pinwarian) units cut by Algonquin gabbro.

    “It differs from Algonquin terrane in that it lacks supracrustal rocks or evidence for a polycyclic history, being composed of juvenile Mesoproterozoic (Pinwarian) units cut by Algonquin gabbro (Timmermann et al. 1997).”

    From The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation (2002) · cites this paper as Timmermann et al. 1997

  • Muskoka domain underwent granulite-facies metamorphism during the Ottawa orogeny at c. 1080-1065 Ma, coeval with that in the adjacent Algonquin terrane.

    “Muskoka domain underwent granulite-facies metamorphism during the Ottawa orogeny at c45 1080-1065 Ma (Culshaw et al. 1997; Timmermann et al. 1997), coeval with that in the adjacent Algonquin terrane.”

    From The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation (2002) · cites this paper as Timmermann et al. 1997

  • The current geometry of the Composite Arc belt reflects principally thrusting and extension at c. 1080-1050 Ma.

    “However, the current geometry of the belt reflects principally thrusting and extension at c45 1080-1050 Ma (Timmermann et al. 1997; Carr et al. 2000).”

    From The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation (2002) · cites this paper as Timmermann et al. 1997

  • Evidence for northwest-directed, reverse displacement on the Composite Arc boundary thrust zone is widespread and has been bracketed between 1080 and 1050 Ma.

    “Evidence for northwest-directed, reverse displacement is widespread and has been bracketed between 1080 and 1050 Ma (Timmermann et al. 1997).”

    From The High Pressure belt in the Grenville Province: architecture, timing, and exhumation (2002) · cites this paper as Timmermann et al. 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Timmermann, H., Jamieson, R. A., Culshaw, N. G., & Parrish, R. R.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1023-1029
ISSN
  • 0008-4077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3313
OpenAlex
W2004108467
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Geochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits
Keywords
Grenville orogen, Central Metasedimentary Belt, Central Gneiss Belt, high-grade metamorphism, zircon U-Pb geochronology, titanite, charnockite, partial melting, Laurentia margin, Grenville Province

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review