Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Monazite as a metamorphic chronometer, south of the Grenville Front, western Quebec

Childe, Fiona, Doig, Ronald, Gariépy, Clément·1993·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

Monazite was utilized as a chronometer to examine the effects of high-grade metamorphism across the Parautochthonous Belt and Allochthon Boundary Thrust of the Grenville Province in western Quebec. This study, in addition to previous geo-chronological studies, indicates an Archean component in the gneisses, which is consistent with the presence of more than one set of peak metamorphic conditions.Single-grain monazite analyses from metasedimentary gneisses from four locations within the Parautochthonous Belt yielded Grenvillian U–Pb dates of 1000 ± 5 to 1006 ± 2 Ma. The location farthest to the northwest, 45 km southeast of the Grenville Front, included monazite with a distinct Archean signature. Southeast of this point an Archean signature was not detected in the monazite. At 70 km southeast of the Grenville Front, monazite yielded two discrete ages of 1005 ± 2 and 1020 ± 3 Ma. Xenotime from one location indicated that the closure temperature of this mineral may be equivalent to that of monazite (725 ± 25 °C).Monazite from the Allochthon Boundary Thrust, 135 km southeast of the Grenville Front, yielded 207Pb/206Pb dates of 1049–1092 Ma, indicating earlier cooling than rocks closer to the Grenville Front. The monazite age was combined with that of rutile from the same location to determine a cooling rate of 2 °C/Ma following cooling through the closure temperature of monazite. The abrupt transition from Archean to Grenvillian ages some 45 km southeast of the Grenville Front is…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e93-089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Réservoir Dozois terrane, the Grenvillian metamorphic overprint only becomes more pervasive about 50 km southeast of the Grenville Front in the vicinity of an extensional shear zone (the Dorval detachment), where circa 1 Ga monazite ages and both Archean and Grenvillian monazite ages in single samples have been recorded.

    “In this terrane, the Grenvillian metamorphic overprint only becomes more pervasive about 50 km southeast of the Grenville Front in the vicinity of an extensional shear zone (the Dorval detachment), where Childe et al. [1993] recorded circa 1 Ga monazite ages from gneisses that yielded Archean Sm-Nd model ages, and Martignole and Martelat [2005] recorded both Archean and Grenvillian monazite ages”
  • In the Reservoir Dozois region, monazite records ages between 1020 and 995 Ma.

    “In the same region, monazite records ages between 1020 and 995 Ma (Childe et al. 1993) (Fig. 6).”
  • Increase in metamorphic grade in the Grenville Front Tectonic Zone of western Quebec is due to progressive exhumation of deeper levels of Archean crust.

    “For instance, increase in metamorphic grade in the Grenville Front Tectonic Zone of western Quebec (Fig. 3) is due to progressive exhumation of deeper levels of Archean crust (Indares and Martignole 1989;Childe et al. 1993).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Childe, F., Doig, R., & Gariépy, C.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
1993-05-01
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
1056-1065
ISSN
  • 0008-4077
  • 1480-3313
Cited by
36
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review