Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transformation of Archean structural inheritance at the Grenvillian Foreland Parautochthon Transition Zone, Chibougamau, Quebec

Daigneault, Real, Allard, Gilles O.·1994·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

The easternmost portion of the Archean Abitibi greenstone belt adjacent to the Grenville Front in the Chibougamau area displays distinctive structural features related to crustal-scale contraction during the Grenvillian orogeny. The "Foreland parautochthon transition zone," (FPTZ) a 3–15 km wide zone of Archean rocks, shows a Grenvillian deformation and metamorphic history that overprint fabrics inherited from the Archean Kenoran orogeny. The deformation history of this zone can be divided into two stages. During stage 1, a major crustal-scale deformation zone is responsible for a first uplift episode of deep Archean crust. During this stage, the Grenvillian deformation reactivated and emphasized the Archean fabrics. Amphibolite-grade mylonitic fabrics are interpreted to be an enhancement of the Archean regional schistosity, which remains axial planar to the regional folds. Archean rocks with well-developed former fabrics are strongly affected by Grenvillian non-coaxial flow associated with southeast-dipping stretching lineations. The northwestward transport direction, deduced from shear-sense indicators, is compatible with the signature of the Grenvillian orogeny. Stage 2 is responsible for the formation of the N015°-trending, late Grenvillian faults that have dissected the stage 1 deformation zone. Steep east-dipping narrow zones of retrograde low-temperature mylonites indicate a reverse, east-side-up movement that has contributed to the uplift of deeper Archean structural levels. In a later stage of brittle deformation, pseudotachylite injections and cataclasis, resulting from sinistral lateral offsets in a dominantly brittle regime, are superimposed on the mylonitic structures in response to a modification of the transport direction at the end of the Grenvillian orogeny. Even if high-grade metamorphism can be partly explained by the uplift of deep Archean crust, the structural signature associated with amphibolite mylonites within the FPTZ is interpreted as a product of the Grenvillian orogeny.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e94-043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study near Chibougamau, central Quebec, Daigneault and Allard [1994] noted a suite of narrow (10-20 m wide) late mylonitic shear zones at the Grenville Front, locally associated with veins of pseudotachylite, that display evidence for transpressional sinistral reverse kinematics and maximum displacement of ~1 km.

    “In a study near Chibougamau, central Que ´bec (see Figure 1 for location), Daigneault and Allard [1994] noted the occurrence of a suite of narrow (10 -20 m wide) late mylonitic shear zones at the Grenville Front, locally associated with veins of pseudotachylite, that display evidence for transpressional sinistral reverse kinematics and maximum displacement of $1 km.”

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Daigneault, R., & Allard, G. O.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
1994-03-01
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
470-488
ISSN
  • 0008-4077
  • 1480-3313
Cited by
11
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review