The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transformation of Archean structural inheritance at the Grenvillian Foreland Parautochthon Transition Zone, Chibougamau, Quebec
Abstract
The easternmost portion of the Archean Abitibi greenstone belt adjacent to the Grenville Front in the Chibougamau area displays distinctive structural features related to crustal-scale contraction during the Grenvillian orogeny. The "Foreland parautochthon transition zone," (FPTZ) a 3–15 km wide zone of Archean rocks, shows a Grenvillian deformation and metamorphic history that overprint fabrics inherited from the Archean Kenoran orogeny. The deformation history of this zone can be divided into two stages. During stage 1, a major crustal-scale deformation zone is responsible for a first uplift episode of deep Archean crust. During this stage, the Grenvillian deformation reactivated and emphasized the Archean fabrics. Amphibolite-grade mylonitic fabrics are interpreted to be an enhancement of the Archean regional schistosity, which remains axial planar to the regional folds. Archean rocks with well-developed former fabrics are strongly affected by Grenvillian non-coaxial flow associated with southeast-dipping stretching lineations. The northwestward transport direction, deduced from shear-sense indicators, is compatible with the signature of the Grenvillian orogeny. Stage 2 is responsible for the formation of the N015°-trending, late Grenvillian faults that have dissected the stage 1 deformation zone. Steep east-dipping narrow zones of retrograde low-temperature mylonites indicate a reverse, east-side-up movement that has contributed to the uplift of deeper Archean structural levels. In a later stage of brittle deformation, pseudotachylite injections and cataclasis, resulting from sinistral lateral offsets in a dominantly brittle regime, are superimposed on the mylonitic structures in response to a modification of the transport direction at the end of the Grenvillian orogeny. Even if high-grade metamorphism can be partly explained by the uplift of deep Archean crust, the structural signature associated with amphibolite mylonites within the FPTZ is interpreted as a product of the Grenvillian orogeny.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study near Chibougamau, central Quebec, Daigneault and Allard [1994] noted a suite of narrow (10-20 m wide) late mylonitic shear zones at the Grenville Front, locally associated with veins of pseudotachylite, that display evidence for transpressional sinistral reverse kinematics and maximum displacement of ~1 km.
“In a study near Chibougamau, central Que ´bec (see Figure 1 for location), Daigneault and Allard [1994] noted the occurrence of a suite of narrow (10 -20 m wide) late mylonitic shear zones at the Grenville Front, locally associated with veins of pseudotachylite, that display evidence for transpressional sinistral reverse kinematics and maximum displacement of $1 km.”
From Grenville Front zone, Gagnon terrane, southwestern Labrador: Configuration of a midcrustal foreland fold‐thrust belt (2008) · cites this paper as Daigneault and Allard, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Gool, J. A. M., Rivers, T., & Calon, T. (2008) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/2006tc002095 · Cited by 35
Rousell, D. H., James, R. S., & Roth, T. M. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2023-0010
Metadata
- Authors
- Daigneault, R., & Allard, G. O.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 470-488
- ISSN
- 0008-4077
- 1480-3313
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review