Cited by 96Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeological and Geophysical Studies

A seismic-based cross-section of the Grenville Orogen in southern Ontario and western Quebec

White, D J, Forsyth, D A, Asudeh, I, Carr, S D, Wu, H, Easton, R M, Mereu, R F·2000·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

A schematic crustal cross-section is presented for the southwestern Grenville Province based on reprocessed Lithoprobe near-vertical incidence seismic reflection data and compiled seismic refraction - wide-angle velocity models interpreted with geological constraints. The schematic crustal architecture of the southwest Grenville Province from southeast to northwest comprises allochthonous crustal elements (Frontenac-Adirondack Belt and Composite Arc Belt) that were assembled prior to ca. 1160 Ma, and then deformed and transported northwest over reworked rocks of pre-Grenvillian Laurentia and the Laurentian margin primarily between 1120 and 980 Ma. Reworked pre-Grenvillian Laurentia and Laurentian margin rocks are interpreted to extend at least 350 km southeast of the Grenville Front beneath all of the Composite Arc Belt. Three major structural boundary zones (the Grenville Front and adjacent Grenville Front Tectonic Zone, the Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary thrust zone, and the Elzevir-Frontenac boundary zone) have been identified across the region of the cross-section based on their prominent geophysical signatures comprising broad zones of southeast-dipping reflections and shallowing of mid-crustal velocity contours by 12-15 km. The structural boundary zones accommodated southeast over northwest crustal stacking at successively earlier times during orogeny (ca. 1010-980 Ma, 1080-1060 Ma, and 1170-1160 Ma, respectively). These shear zones root within an interpreted gently southeast-dipping regional décollement at a depth of 25-30 km corresponding to the top of a high-velocity lower crustal layer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e99-094

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, D. J., Forsyth, D. A., Asudeh, I., Carr, S. D., Wu, H., Easton, R. M., & Mereu, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Geological Survey of Canada (CA)
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
2000-04-02
Volume
37
Issue
2-3
Pages
183-192
ISSN
  • 0008-4077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3313
OpenAlex
W2157950369
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
Keywords
Grenville orogen, Grenville Province, crustal structure, crustal cross-section, Grenville Front, Central Metasedimentary Belt, crustal stacking, décollement, Laurentian margin, Precambrian orogeny, southern Ontario, western Quebec

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review