Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,006

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fish Gill Structural Changes Induced by Toxicants and Other Irritants: A Statistical Review

Mallatt, Jon·1985·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

Here I quantitatively review the literature on how fish gill morphology is affected by chemical and physical irritants in the surrounding water (e.g. various toxicants, extremes of temperature or pH). I catalogued histopathological gill lesions that were reported, and used statistics to explore how such lesions relate to the irritant-exposure conditions under which they occurred (specifically, to dose and class of irritant, to temperature, and to salinity of the surrounding water). Frequently recorded histopathologic lesions include changes in gill epithelium (lifting, necrosis, hyperplasia, hypertrophy, rupture), bulbing or fusing of gill lamellae, hypersecretion and proliferation of mucocytes, and changes in chloride cells and gill vasculature. I conclude that these lesions are largely nonspecific in nature, as each was detected under many different exposure conditions. The lesions are not entirely independent of exposure conditions, however, as my statistical analysis discerns these trends: (1) Most gill lesion types have been reported more frequently after lethal than after sublethal exposure to irritants. (2) Some lesions were more frequently detected in studies employing heavy metals than in studies using organic toxicants or other irritants; such lesions include necrosis and hypertrophy of gill epithelial cells, plus mucous hypersecretion. (3) Lifting of the branchial epithelium, the most commonly reported lesion, was reported more often in freshwater than in marine fish, suggesting that osmolarity of the ambient water influences this lesion. Little relation was found between recorded lesion frequencies and temperature. Following my statistical analysis, the etiology of irritant-induced gill lesions is considered. The nonspecificity of branchial alterations suggests that they primarily represent stereotyped physiological reactions of gills to stress, and many of them are logically considered defense responses. Some branchial alterations have been considered inflammatory, but I conclude that the literature cannot support that hypothesis. Ultrastructural studies have detected irritant-induced disruptions of branchial epithelial cells, including cytoplasmic vacuolization, autophagosomes and inclusions, loss of microvilli, and abnormal mitochondria and nuclei.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f85-083

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,006

Metadata

Authors
Mallatt, J.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
1985-04-01
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
630-648
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W2125178122
Cited by
1,006
References
0
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fish Gill Structural Changes Induced by Toxicants and Other Irritants: A Statistical Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f85-083
The paper
Mallatt, J. (1985). Fish Gill Structural Changes Induced by Toxicants and Other Irritants: A Statistical Review. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f85-083

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.