The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid genomic changes in newly synthesized amphiploids of Triticum and Aegilops. II. Changes in low-copy coding DNA sequences
Abstract
We recently reported that formation of allopolyploid wheat was accompanied by rapid nonrandom changes in low-copy noncoding DNA sequences. In this report we show that following allopolyploidization, changes also occurred in coding sequences. Genomic DNA of nine different newly synthesized amphiploids of different ploidy levels and their parental lines was digested with five restriction enzymes and probed with 43 coding sequences. The sequences, 19 genomic and 24 cDNA sequences, are group (homoeologous) specific and represent the proximal and distal regions of the short and long arms of the seven homoeologous groups of the Triticeae. We revealed three types of changes: disappearance of a parental hybridization fragment(s), appearance of a novel fragment(s), and simultaneous disappearance of a parental fragment(s) and appearance of a novel fragment(s). No elimination of sequences took place, since in every sequence studied the parental hybridization fragments were present in at least one of the enzyme digests. Variations in pattern among individual plants of the same amphiploid, as well as between several synthetic and natural amphiploids, indicated that at least some of the genomic changes occurred at random. Intergenomic recombination was not the cause of the observed changes. Evidence was obtained, however, that changes were also brought about by DNA methylation. Methylation may cause inactivation of genes or modify their expression levels in some of the newly synthesized amphiploid plants, leading to genetic diploidization and gene-dosage compensation and thus increasing variation among individuals.Key words: wheat, allopolyploidy, DNA methylation, genetic diploidization, genome evolution, group (homoeologous) specific sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation
Bird, A. P. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321209a0 · Cited by 3,777
Cited by
Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Tate, J. A. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x · Cited by 720
Shaked, H., Kashkush, K., Ozkan, H., Feldman, M., & Levy, A. A. (2001) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.010083 · Cited by 688
Self-citationDoubling down on genomes: Polyploidy and crop plants
Renny‐Byfield, S., & Wendel, J. F. (2014) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1400119 · Cited by 406
Polyploid formation in cotton is not accompanied by rapid genomic changes
Liu, B., Brubaker, C. L., Mergeai, G., Cronn, R. C., & Wendel, J. F. (2001) · Genome · doi:10.1139/g01-011 · Cited by 353
Self-citationThe effect of stress on genome regulation and structure
MADLUNG, A. (2004) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mch172 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, B., Vega, J. M., & Feldman, M.
- Venue
- Genome
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 535-542
- ISSN
- 0831-2796 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3321
- OpenAlex
- W2167914707
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid genomic changes in newly synthesized amphiploids of Triticum and Aegilops. II. Changes in low-copy coding DNA sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/g98-052
- The paper
- Liu, B., Vega, J. M., & Feldman, M. (1998). Rapid genomic changes in newly synthesized amphiploids of Triticum and Aegilops. II. Changes in low-copy coding DNA sequences. Genome. https://doi.org/10.1139/g98-052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.