The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pedometer-Determined Step Count Guidelines for Classifying Walking Intensity in a Young Ostensibly Healthy Population
Abstract
Purpose: (a) To establish pedometer steps/min intensity categories (i.e., light, moderate, hard, very hard) for adults under controlled conditions, and (b) use these cut-points to ascertain the number of steps expected in 30 minutes of moderate intensity activity. Methods: 25 men and 25 women, ages 18-39 years, performed 6-min exercise bouts at 3 treadmill speeds (4.8, 6.4, and 9.7 km/hr). Yamax SW-200 pedometers indicated steps, and steady-state [Formula: see text] was recorded. METs were calculated by dividing steady-state [Formula: see text] by 3.5 ml•kg−1 min−1. Linear regression was used to quantify the relationships between steps/min and METs across all speeds. Ten participants (5 M, 5 F) were randomly selected from the original 50 and constituted a holdout sample for cross-validation purposes (i.e, comparing actual and predicted METs; paired t-test). Results: The regression equation for males was: METs = −7.065 + (0.105*steps/min) r 2 = 0.803. For females it was: METs = −8.805 + (0.110*steps/min) r 2 = 0.830. Cross-validation was confirmed. Conclusions: Pedometer cut-points corresponding to minimal moderate intensity walking were 96 steps/min in men and 107 steps/min in women, or roughly 100 steps/min for both. This translates to approximately 3,000 steps in 30 min of moderate-intensity ambulatory activity for both genders. Key words: exercise, outcome assessment, motion sensor
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer
FREEDSON, P. S., MELANSON, E., & SIRARD, J. (1998) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021 · Cited by 3,825
Physical fitness and activity as separate heart disease risk factors: a meta-analysis
WILLIAMS, P. T. (2001) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200105000-00012 · Cited by 724
Tudor-Locke, C., Bell, R. C., Myers, A. M., Harris, S. B., Ecclestone, N. A., Lauzon, N., & Rodger, N. W. (2004) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802485 · Cited by 321
Self-citation
Cited by
How Many Steps/Day Are Enough?: Preliminary Pedometer Indices for Public Health
Tudor-Locke, C., & Bassett, D. R. (2004) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001 · Cited by 2,054
Self-citationWang, R., Chen, F., Chen, Z., Li, T., Harari, G., Tignor, S., Zhou, X., Ben-Zeev, D., & Campbell, A. T. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1145/2632048.2632054 · Cited by 1,116
How many steps/day are enough? for adults
Tudor-Locke, C., Craig, C. L., Brown, W. J., Clemes, S. A., De Cocker, K., Giles-Corti, B., Hatano, Y., Inoue, S., Matsudo, S. M., Mutrie, N., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-79 · Cited by 1,087
Self-citationPassive and In-Situ assessment of mental and physical well-being using mobile sensors
Rabbi, M., Ali, S., Choudhury, T., & Berke, E. (2011) · Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing · doi:10.1145/2030112.2030164 · Cited by 243
Using Cadence to Study Free-Living Ambulatory Behaviour
Tudor-Locke, C., & Rowe, D. A. (2012) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/11599170-000000000-00000 · Cited by 231
Self-citationLow‐intensity daily walking activity is associated with hippocampal volume in older adults
Varma, V. R., Chuang, Y., Harris, G. C., Tan, E. J., & Carlson, M. C. (2015) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22397 · Cited by 188
Accelerometer-Determined Steps/Day and Metabolic Syndrome
Sisson, S. B., Camhi, S. M., Church, T. S., Tudor-Locke, C., Johnson, W. D., & Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2010) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.015 · Cited by 116
Self-citationPractical Approaches to Prescribing Physical Activity and Monitoring Exercise Intensity
Reed, J. L., & Pipe, A. L. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.12.024 · Cited by 100
Step accumulation per minute epoch is not the same as cadence for free-living adults
DALL, P. M., MCCRORIE, P. R. W., GRANAT, M. H., & STANSFIELD, B. W. (2013) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3182955780 · Cited by 62
Tudor-Locke, C., Craig, C. L., Cameron, C., & Griffiths, J. M. (2011) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-66 · Cited by 57
Self-citationDuncan, M. J., Vandelanotte, C., Trost, S. G., Rebar, A. L., Rogers, N., Burton, N. W., Murawski, B., Rayward, A., Fenton, S., & Brown, W. J. (2016) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3256-x · Cited by 43
Fanaroff, A. C., Patel, M. S., Chokshi, N., Coratti, S., Farraday, D., Norton, L., Rareshide, C., Zhu, J., Szymczak, J. E., Russell, L. B., et al. (2023) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.014 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Tudor-Locke, C., Sisson, S. B., Collova, T., Lee, S. M., & Swan, P. D.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 666-676
- ISSN
- 1066-7814 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103727670
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
