Cited by 100Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Practical Approaches to Prescribing Physical Activity and Monitoring Exercise Intensity

Reed, Jennifer L., Pipe, Andrew L.·2016·Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Regular physical activity helps to prevent heart disease, and reduces the risk of first or subsequent cardiovascular events. It is recommended that Canadian adults accumulate at least 150 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise per week, in bouts of 10 minutes or more, and perform muscle- and bone-strengthening activities at least 2 days per week. Individual exercise prescriptions can be developed using the frequency, intensity, time, and type principles. Increasing evidence suggests that high-intensity interval training is efficacious for a broad spectrum of heart health outcomes. Several practical approaches to prescribing and monitoring exercise intensity exist including: heart rate monitoring, the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale, the Talk Test, and, motion sensors. The Borg rating of perceived exertion scale matches a numerical value to an individual's perception of effort, and can also be used to estimate heart rate. The Talk Test, the level at which simple conversation is possible, can be used to monitor desired levels of moderate- to vigorous-intensity exercise. Motion sensors can provide users with practical and useful exercise training information to aid in meeting current exercise recommendations. These approaches can be used by the public, exercise scientists, and clinicians to easily and effectively guide physical activity in a variety of settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.12.024

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reed, J. L., & Pipe, A. L.
Affiliations
Ottawa Heart Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Reed, Jennifer L.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
514-522
ISSN
0828-282X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2201630073
Cited by
100
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
exercise prescription, exercise intensity monitoring, heart rate monitoring, Borg rating of perceived exertion, talk test, motion sensors, high-intensity interval training, cardiovascular disease prevention, physical activity guidelines, aerobic exercise, muscle-strengthening activity, cardiovascular health
MeSH terms
Adult, Exercise Therapy, Heart Diseases, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Motor Activity, Exercise Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review