Cited by 116Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Interval training at 95% and 100% of the velocity at V O 2 max : effects on aerobic physiological indexes and running performance

Denadai, Benedito S, Ortiz, Marcelo J, Greco, Camila C, de Mello, Marco T·2006·Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of two different high-intensity interval training (HIT) programs on selected aerobic physiological indices and 1500 and 5000 m running performance in well-trained runners. The following tests were completed (n=17): (i) incremental treadmill test to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max), running velocity associated with VO2 max (vVO2 max), and the velocity corresponding to 3.5 mmol/L of blood lactate concentration (vOBLA); (ii) submaximal constant-intensity test to determine running economy (RE); and (iii) 1500 and 5000 m time trials on a 400 m track. Runners were then randomized into 95% vVO2 max or 100% vVO2 max groups, and undertook a 4 week training program consisting of 2 HIT sessions (performed at 95% or 100% vVO2 max, respectively) and 4 submaximal run sessions per week. Runners were retested on all parameters at the completion of the training program. The VO2 max values were not different after training for both groups. There was a significant increase in post-training vVO2 max, RE, and 1500 m running performance in the 100% vVO2 max group. The vOBLA and 5000 m running performance were significantly higher after the training period for both groups. We conclude that vOBLA and 5000 m running performance can be significantly improved in well-trained runners using a 4 week training program consisting of 2 HIT sessions (performed at 95% or 100% vVO2 max) and 4 submaximal run sessions per week. However, the improvemen…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/h06-080

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denadai, B. S., Ortiz, M. J., Greco, C. C., & de Mello, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Human Performance Laboratory, Av. 24 A, 1515, Bela Vista, UNESP, Rio Claro, CEP, 13506-900, Brazil.
Venue
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Published
2006-12
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
737-743
ISSN
  • 1715-5312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-5320
OpenAlex
W2097568421
Cited by
116
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
high-intensity interval training, cardiorespiratory fitness, running economy, lactate threshold, well-trained runners
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Running, Task Performance and Analysis, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review