Cited by 60Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution

Microbial degradation of [14C]polystyrene and 1,3-diphenylbutane

Sielicki, M., Focht, D. D., Martin, J. P.·1978·Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Abstract

Microbial degradation of [β-14 C]polystyrene and 1,3-diphenylbutane, a compound structurally representing the smallest repeating unit of styrene (dimer), was investigated in soil and liquid enrichment cultures. Degradation rates in soil, as determined by 14 CO 2 evolution from applied [14 C]polystyrene, varied from 1.5 to 3.0% for a 4-month period. Although relatively low, these percentages were 15 to 30 times greater than values previously reported. Enrichment cultures, containing 1,3-diphenylbutane as the only carbon source, were used to determine the mechanisms of microbial oxidation of the polymer chain ends. Metabolism of 1,3-diphenylbutane appeared to involve the attack by a monooxygenase to form 2-phenyl-4-hydroxyphenylbutane followed by a further oxidation and subsequent fission of the benzene ring to yield 4-phenylvaleric acid and an unidentified 5-carbon fragment via the classic meta-fission pathway. Phenylacetic acid was probably formed from 4-phenylvaleric acid by subsequent β-oxidation of the side chain, methyl-oxidation, and decarboxylation. An initial examination of the population of microorganisms in the diphenylbutane enrichment cultures indicated that these oxidative reactions are carried out by common soil microorganisms of the genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Micrococcus, and Nocardia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/m78-134

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infrared spectroscopy allows measuring plastic oxidation states, and isotopically labelled plastics can be used in isotope probing assays for tracing matter from the polymer into microbial reaction products and biomass.

    “The basis for such methods could be, for example, infrared spectroscopy, which allows measuring plastic oxidation states, 82 or isotopically labelled plastics that can be used in isotope probing assays for tracing matter from the polymer into microbial reaction products and biomass.135,136”

    From The fate of plastic in the ocean environment – a minireview (2021) · cites this paper as [135]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sielicki, M., Focht, D. D., & Martin, J. P.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
Published
1978-07-01
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
798-803
ISSN
  • 0008-4166 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3275
OpenAlex
W2033143692
Cited by
60
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Keywords
polystyrene degradation, styrene dimers, microbial degradation, soil microbes, enrichment culture, mixed function oxidase, phenylacetic acid, fatty acid beta-oxidation, 14CO2 evolution, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Micrococcus, Nocardia
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Biodegradation, Environmental, Butanes, Catechol Oxidase, Oxidation-Reduction, Polystyrenes, Soil Microbiology, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review