Cited by 425Fire effects on ecosystemsForest ecology and managementForest Management and Policy

Age-class distribution and the forest fire cycle

Wagner, C. E. Van·1978·Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

The expected age-class structure of a forest dependent on random periodic fire for disturbance and renewal is derived and presented. It is simply the negative exponential distribution, well known in probability mathematics. An important feature of this concept is that the present age-class structure of such a forest is the key to its past fire history. Its limitations are discussed, and the computer simulation of variations, including the interaction of fire and logging, is described. Three examples of its use in interpreting fire history are given.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/x78-034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, C. E. V.
Corresponding author
Wagner, C. E. Van
Venue
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Published
1978-06-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
220-227
ISSN
  • 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6037
OpenAlex
W2130609439
Cited by
425
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
forest age structure, age class distribution, fire cycle, negative exponential distribution, fire history reconstruction, forest regeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review