The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites
Abstract
Above- and below-ground net primary production was estimated for 40-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsugamenziesii (Mirb.) Franco) stands growing on sites with apparently large differences in productivity potential. Aboveground net production was estimated from direct measurements of tree growth; belowground productivity was derived from data obtained by sorting live and dead roots from soil cores used in combination with measurements of root growth on observation windows.Aboveground net production was 13.7 t•ha−1 on the high productivity site and 7.3 t•ha−1 on the low productivity site. Belowground dry matter production on the high productivity site was 4.1 t•ha−1 compared with 8.1 t•ha−1 for the poorer site. On the more productive site, 8% of total stand dry matter production was in fine roots in contrast to over 36% on the poorer site. The difference in total net production (aboveground plus belowground) between the two sites was small (2.4 t•ha−1). Apparent differences in aboveground productivity may, to a large extent, result from the need for a greater investment in the fine roots on harsher sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems
GILL, R. A., & JACKSON, R. B. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00681.x · Cited by 1,300
Algeo, T. J., & Scheckler, S. E. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0195 · Cited by 769
Fine Roots, Net Primary Production, and Soil Nitrogen Availability: A New Hypothesis
Nadelhoffer, K. J., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939190 · Cited by 546
Ryan, M. G., Hubbard, R. M., Pongracic, S., Raison, R. J., & McMurtrie, R. E. (1996) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/16.3.333 · Cited by 544
Metadata
- Authors
- Keyes, M. R., & Grier, C. C.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1981-09-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 599-605
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2058837602
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x81-082
- The paper
- Keyes, M. R., & Grier, C. C. (1981). Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x81-082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.