Microtubule and Neurofilament Densities in Amphibian Spinal Root Nerve Fibers: Relationship to Axoplasmic Transport
Abstract
Dark-field microscopy of living myelinated nerve fibers from the spinal roots of Xenopus laevis revealed many spherical organelles moving in the axoplasm of fibers from the ventral roots and in fibers just distal to the dorsal root ganglion. Similar organelles were present but few were seen to move along fibers from the dorsal roots central to the ganglion. This observation prompted an ultrastructural study of microtubule and neurofilament densities in the myelinated fibers of the spinal roots. The density of microtubules was significantly less in fibers from the central part of the dorsal roots than in the rest of the spinal root system. Neurofilament densities were equivalent in all parts of the roots. Microtubules showed a significant association with mitochondria in the ventral roots and in the dorsal roots distal to the ganglion, but no significant association was obtained for the dorsal roots central to the ganglion. The meaning of these results in the axoplasmic transport of large organelles is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An analogous situation occurs in dorsal root ganglion cells, where there are differences in the structure and transport of cytoskeletal elements in the peripheral and central branches of the axon.
“An analogous situation occurs in dorsal root ganglion cells, where there are differences in the structure and transport of cytoskeletal elements in the peripheral and central branches of the axon (Mori et al., 1979;Smith, 1973;Wujek and Lasek, 1983;Zenker et al., 1975).”
From Immunocytochemical localization of tubulin and microtubule-associated protein 2 during the development of hippocampal neurons in culture (1986) · cites this paper as Smith, 1973
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Caceres, A., Banker, G., & Binder, L. (1986) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.06-03-00714.1986 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Schlaepfer, W., & Lynch, R. (1977) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.74.1.241 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, R. S.
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Richard S.
- ORCID
- Smith, Richard S.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1973-11-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 798-806
- ISSN
- 0008-4212 (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7541
- OpenAlex
- W2080972513
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- microtubules, neurofilaments, axonal transport, myelinated axons, spinal nerve roots, dorsal root ganglia, ventral root, Xenopus laevis, organelle transport, mitochondria, nerve fiber ultrastructure
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axons, Axonal Transport, Biological Transport, Cytoplasm, Microscopy, Electron, Microtubules, Mitochondria, Neurofibrils, Spinal Nerve Roots, Xenopus, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review