Cited by 30Wildlife Ecology and ConservationMarine animal studies overviewAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Evidence for and possible causes of increased mortality of bull muskoxen during severe winters

Gunn, Anne, Miller, Frank L., McLean, Bruce·1989·Canadian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) were classified by sex and age at 12 locations on four islands in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Northwest Territories. We classified 147 muskoxen on Bailey Point, southwestern Melville Island, and 92 on northeastern Prince of Wales Island in August 1983. We subsequently classified 5449 muskoxen on western Victoria and Banks islands in July–August 1986, which we used as a basis for evaluating the 1983 samples. The pooled sex ratio for muskoxen ≥ 3 years old was significantly skewed toward females, and the proportion of single bulls was also lower on Bailey Point than on northeastern Prince of Wales Island in August 1983 or on Banks or Victoria islands in July–August 1986. Sexual behaviour was frequently observed at Bailey Point in August 1983, which suggests that both bulls and cows were in breeding condition. Almost no aggressive rutting behaviour was seen at Bailey Point, in contrast to observation of the complete range of sexual and aggressive behaviours on Prince of Wales Island. Above-average (1970–1985) snow depths were experienced from March to May in five of the six winters preceding winter 1982–1983. We suggest that severe winters imposed malnutrition-related mortality on spent bulls. The depleted fat reserves of these bulls apparently could not sustain them during severe and prolonged winters. This kind of winter mortality among breeding bulls likely is higher in areas of high muskox densities where more interactions between bulls during the rut lead to greater energetic costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/z89-157

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing temperatures, especially in fall and winter, increase the likelihood of extreme weather events including deeper than average snow depths, ice-crust formation, and rain-on-snow events.

    “Increasing temperatures, especially in fall and winter, increase the likelihood of extreme weather events including deeper than average snow depths (Gunn et al. 1989; Reynolds 1998), ice-crust formation (Forchhammer and Boertmann 1993), and rain-on-snow events (Gunn et al. 1989; Putkonen et al. 2009).”

    From Muskox status, recent variation, and uncertain future (2020) · cites this paper as Gunn et al. 1989

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunn, A., Miller, F. L., & McLean, B.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Published
1989-05-01
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
1106-1111
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
OpenAlex
W2038217818
Cited by
30
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
Ovibos moschatus, winter mortality, bulls, sex ratio, snow depth, malnutrition, fat reserves, energetic cost, population density, sexual behavior, Arctic Archipelago

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review