Cited by 10Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The path model of parenting style, attachment style, self-regulation and Smartphone addiction

Kwan, H. C., Leung, M. T.·2015·Applied Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/9789814723398_0011

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwan, H. C., & Leung, M. T.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Shue Yan University (CN)
Venue
Applied Psychology
Published
2015-09-25
Pages
196-214
ISSN
0269-994X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2320689987
Cited by
10
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
parenting styles, attachment styles, self-regulation, smartphone addiction, path analysis, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review