Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

APPLICATION OF RECURRENCE QUANTIFICATION ANALYSIS FOR THE AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF EPILEPTIC EEG SIGNALS

ACHARYA, U. RAJENDRA, SREE, S. VINITHA, CHATTOPADHYAY, SUBHAGATA, YU, WENWEI, ANG, PENG CHUAN ALVIN·2011·International Journal of Neural Systems

Abstract

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder that is characterized by the recurrence of seizures. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are widely used to diagnose seizures. Because of the non-linear and dynamic nature of the EEG signals, it is difficult to effectively decipher the subtle changes in these signals by visual inspection and by using linear techniques. Therefore, non-linear methods are being researched to analyze the EEG signals. In this work, we use the recorded EEG signals in Recurrence Plots (RP), and extract Recurrence Quantification Analysis (RQA) parameters from the RP in order to classify the EEG signals into normal, ictal, and interictal classes. Recurrence Plot (RP) is a graph that shows all the times at which a state of the dynamical system recurs. Studies have reported significantly different RQA parameters for the three classes. However, more studies are needed to develop classifiers that use these promising features and present good classification accuracy in differentiating the three types of EEG segments. Therefore, in this work, we have used ten RQA parameters to quantify the important features in the EEG signals.These features were fed to seven different classifiers: Support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Fuzzy Sugeno Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC), Decision Tree (DT), and Radial Basis Probabilistic Neural Network (RBPNN). Our results show that the SVM classifier was able to identify the EEG class with an average efficiency of 95.6%, sensitivity and specificity of 98.9% and 97.8%, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0129065711002808

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
ACHARYA, U. R., SREE, S. V., CHATTOPADHYAY, S., YU, W., & ANG, P. C. A.
Venue
International Journal of Neural Systems
Published
2011-06
Volume
21
Issue
03
Pages
199-211
ISSN
  • 0129-0657 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6462
OpenAlex
W2158976038
Cited by
323
References
53
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: APPLICATION OF RECURRENCE QUANTIFICATION ANALYSIS FOR THE AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF EPILEPTIC EEG SIGNALS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0129065711002808
The paper
ACHARYA, U. R., SREE, S. V., CHATTOPADHYAY, S., YU, W., & ANG, P. C. A. (2011). APPLICATION OF RECURRENCE QUANTIFICATION ANALYSIS FOR THE AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF EPILEPTIC EEG SIGNALS. International Journal of Neural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0129065711002808

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.