The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
APPLICATION OF RECURRENCE QUANTIFICATION ANALYSIS FOR THE AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF EPILEPTIC EEG SIGNALS
Abstract
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder that is characterized by the recurrence of seizures. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are widely used to diagnose seizures. Because of the non-linear and dynamic nature of the EEG signals, it is difficult to effectively decipher the subtle changes in these signals by visual inspection and by using linear techniques. Therefore, non-linear methods are being researched to analyze the EEG signals. In this work, we use the recorded EEG signals in Recurrence Plots (RP), and extract Recurrence Quantification Analysis (RQA) parameters from the RP in order to classify the EEG signals into normal, ictal, and interictal classes. Recurrence Plot (RP) is a graph that shows all the times at which a state of the dynamical system recurs. Studies have reported significantly different RQA parameters for the three classes. However, more studies are needed to develop classifiers that use these promising features and present good classification accuracy in differentiating the three types of EEG segments. Therefore, in this work, we have used ten RQA parameters to quantify the important features in the EEG signals.These features were fed to seven different classifiers: Support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Fuzzy Sugeno Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC), Decision Tree (DT), and Radial Basis Probabilistic Neural Network (RBPNN). Our results show that the SVM classifier was able to identify the EEG class with an average efficiency of 95.6%, sensitivity and specificity of 98.9% and 97.8%, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques
Thamaraiselvi, G., & Kaliammal, A. (2014) · Journal of Information and Knowledge · Cited by 4,088
Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems
MARWAN, N., CARMENROMANO, M., THIEL, M., & KURTHS, J. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.11.001 · Cited by 3,814
Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems
Eckmann, J.-P., Kamphorst, S. O., & Ruelle, D. (1987) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/4/9/004 · Cited by 3,284
Andrzejak, R. G., Lehnertz, K., Mormann, F., Rieke, C., David, P., & Elger, C. E. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.061907 · Cited by 3,032
EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and a mixture of expert model.
SUBASI, A. (2007) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.005 · Cited by 1,182
Data Mining Concepts and Techniques Third Edition
Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2021) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 1,180
Analysis of EEG records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform
Adeli, H., Zhou, Z., & Dadmehr, N. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00340-0 · Cited by 1,154
Embeddings and delays as derived from quantification of recurrence plots
Zbilut, J. P., & Webber, C. L. (1992) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(92)90426-m · Cited by 1,114
Entropies for detection of epilepsy in EEG
Kannathal, N., Choo, M. L., Acharya, U. R., & Sadasivan, P. K. (2005) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.06.012 · Cited by 753
Self-citation
Cited by
Acharya, U. R., Oh, S. L., Hagiwara, Y., Tan, J. H., & Adeli, H. (2018) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.09.017 · Cited by 1,647
Self-citationACHARYA, U. R., SREE, S. V., ANG, P. C. A., YANTI, R., & SURI, J. S. (2012) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065712500025 · Cited by 320
Self-citationBhattacharyya, A., Pachori, R., Upadhyay, A., & Acharya, U. (2017) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app7040385 · Cited by 284
Self-citationGiri, D., Rajendra Acharya, U., Martis, R. J., Vinitha Sree, S., Lim, T.-C., Ahamed, T., & Suri, J. S. (2013) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2012.08.011 · Cited by 221
Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Automated Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
Raghavendra, U., Acharya, U. R., & Adeli, H. (2019) · European Neurology · doi:10.1159/000504292 · Cited by 174
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ACHARYA, U. R., SREE, S. V., CHATTOPADHYAY, S., YU, W., & ANG, P. C. A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Neural Systems
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 199-211
- ISSN
- 0129-0657 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6462
- OpenAlex
- W2158976038
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: APPLICATION OF RECURRENCE QUANTIFICATION ANALYSIS FOR THE AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF EPILEPTIC EEG SIGNALS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0129065711002808
- The paper
- ACHARYA, U. R., SREE, S. V., CHATTOPADHYAY, S., YU, W., & ANG, P. C. A. (2011). APPLICATION OF RECURRENCE QUANTIFICATION ANALYSIS FOR THE AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION OF EPILEPTIC EEG SIGNALS. International Journal of Neural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0129065711002808
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.