Cited by 18Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

ZITTERBEWEGUNG IS NOT AN OBSERVABLE

Open access
O'CONNELL, R. F.·2011·Modern Physics Letters A

Abstract

It has recently been claimed that Zitterbewegung has been observed. However, we argue that it is not an observable and that the authors' observations must be reinterpreted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0217732311034967

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation, Zitterbewegung disappears for massless Dirac particles.

    “In the FW representation, it disappears not only for massive [9-11] but also for massless Dirac particles.”

    From <i>Zitterbewegung</i> of massless particles (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    The discussion on p. 2 says the Foldy–Wouthuysen representation of a free Dirac particle has no Zitterbewegung. It does not address massless Dirac particles specifically, so it does not establish the claim's massless qualification. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This conclusion agrees with previous studies [3-5,9-14] for massive particles.

    “This is the same conclusion which has been made in the previous studies [3-5,9-14].”

    From <i>Zitterbewegung</i> of massless particles (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]C. Moller, 'The Theory of Relativity,' 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 1972), p. 176.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'CONNELL, R. F.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803-4001, USA
Venue
Modern Physics Letters A
Published
2011-03-07
Volume
26
Issue
07
Pages
469-471
ISSN
  • 0217-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6632
OpenAlex
W2081991567
Cited by
18
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Zitterbewegung, electron spin precession, quantum measurement, observability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review