Cited by 2,077Handwritten Text Recognition TechniquesUser Authentication and Security SystemsBiometric Identification and Security

Signature Verification Using A "Siamese" Time Delay Neural Network

BROMLEY, JANE, BENTZ, JAMES W., BOTTOU, LÉON, GUYON, ISABELLE, LECUN, YANN, MOORE, CLIFF, SÄCKINGER, EDUARD, SHAH, ROOPAK·1993·International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This paper describes the development of an algorithm for verification of signatures written on a touch-sensitive pad. The signature verification algorithm is based on an artificial neural network. The novel network presented here, called a “Siamese” time delay neural network, consists of two identical networks joined at their output. During training the network learns to measure the similarity between pairs of signatures. When used for verification, only one half of the Siamese network is evaluated. The output of this half network is the feature vector for the input signature. Verification consists of comparing this feature vector with a stored feature vector for the signer. Signatures closer than a chosen threshold to this stored representation are accepted, all other signatures are rejected as forgeries. System performance is illustrated with experiments performed in the laboratory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218001493000339

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Siamese Network shares weights for both branches, and corresponding similar or unique output features are derived depending on the inputs.

    “The characteristic of this structure is the shared weights for both branches, and corresponding similar or unique output features are derived depending on the inputs to the branches accordingly.”

    From Noise Based Deepfake Detection via Multi-Head Relative-Interaction (2023) · cites this paper as Bromley et al. 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BROMLEY, J., BENTZ, J. W., BOTTOU, L., GUYON, I., LECUN, Y., MOORE, C., SÄCKINGER, E., & SHAH, R.
Affiliations
  • AT&T (United States) (US)
  • NCR (United States) (US)
Venue
International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
Published
1993-08
Volume
07
Issue
04
Pages
669-688
ISSN
  • 0218-0014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6381
OpenAlex
W2171590421
Cited by
2,077
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 203 · 2023: 290 · 2022: 320 · 2021: 301 · 2020: 212 · 2019: 175 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
signature verification, Siamese network, time-delay neural networks, feature vectors, forgery detection, biometric authentication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review