Cited by 21Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionGait Recognition and Analysis

Siamese Networks for Weakly Supervised Human Activity Recognition

Open access
Sheng, Taoran, Huber, Manfred·2019·2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC)

Abstract

Deep learning has been successfully applied to human activity recognition. However, training deep neural networks requires explicitly labeled data which is difficult to acquire. In this paper, we present a model with multiple siamese networks that are trained by using only the information about the similarity between pairs of data samples without knowing the explicit labels. The trained model maps the activity data samples into fixed size representation vectors such that the distance between the vectors in the representation space approximates the similarity of the data samples in the input space. Thus, the trained model can work as a metric for a wide range of different clustering algorithms. The training process minimizes a similarity loss function that forces the distance metric to be small for pairs of samples from the same kind of activity, and large for pairs of samples from different kinds of activities. We evaluate the model on three datasets to verify its effectiveness in segmentation and recognition of continuous human activity sequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/smc.2019.8914045

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. T. Tamura, M. Sekine, M. Ogawa, T. Togawa, and Y. Fukui, "Classi- fication of acceleration waveforms during walking by wavelet trans- form," Methods of information in medicine, vol. 36, pp. 356-9, 01 1998.
  2. M. Zeng, L. T. Nguyen, B. Yu, O. J. Mengshoel, J. Zhu, P. Wu, and J. Zhang, "Convolutional neural networks for human activity recognition using mobile sensors," in 6th International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications and Services, pp. 197-205, Nov 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheng, T., & Huber, M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Venue
2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
4069-4075
ISSN
1062-922X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991288262
Cited by
21
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
Siamese network, weakly supervised learning, human activity recognition, similarity loss, metric learning, clustering, activity segmentation, representation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review