Cited by 74Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsVibration and Dynamic AnalysisAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research

SHOCK ISOLATION THROUGH PASSIVE ENERGY PUMPING CAUSED BY NONSMOOTH NONLINEARITIES

Open access
GEORGIADIS, F., VAKAKIS, A. F., MCFARLAND, D. M., BERGMAN, L.·2005·International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos

Abstract

We investigate shock isolation designs based on nonlinear energy pumping caused by nonsmooth stiffness elements. In particular, we numerically study the shock isolation properties of a primary linear system of two coupled nonconservative oscillators with weakly coupled attachments possessing clearance nonlinearities. Under shock excitation the nonlinear attachments (termed nonlinear energy sinks — NESs) can be designed to absorb a significant portion of the input energy, thus enhancing the shock isolation performance of the primary system. In contrast to the classical linear vibration absorber whose operation is restricted to narrowband frequency ranges, the NESs are capable of efficiently absorbing energies caused by transient broadband disturbances, a feature that facilitates their implementation in practical applications. Moreover, the nonsmooth nonlinearities considered in this work are easily implementable since they are realized by means of linear stiffness elements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218127405013101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-smooth stiffness nonlinearities were first analyzed four years later by Georgiades et al. where a 2-DOF linear primary system was coupled to two NESs possessing a linear internal restoring spring together with a clearance stiffness.

    “However, the non-smooth stiffness nonlinearities were first analyzed four years later by Georgiades et al. in [105] where 2-DOF linear primary system was coupled to two NESs possessing a linear internal restoring spring together with a clearance stiffness.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GEORGIADIS, F., VAKAKIS, A. F., MCFARLAND, D. M., & BERGMAN, L.
Affiliations
  • Division of Mechanics, National Technical University of Athens, Greece
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos
Published
2005-06
Volume
15
Issue
06
Pages
1989-2001
ISSN
  • 0218-1274 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6551
OpenAlex
W2042549572
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace - NTUA (National Technical University of Athens) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Keywords
shock isolation, nonlinear energy sink, nonsmooth nonlinearities, clearance nonlinearity, vibration absorber

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review