Cited by 64Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsVibration and Dynamic AnalysisSeismic Performance and Analysis

Comparison of a modified vibro-impact nonlinear energy sink with other kinds of NESs

AL-Shudeifat, Mohammad A., Saeed, Adnan S.·2021·Meccanica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11012-020-01193-3

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AL-Shudeifat, M. A., & Saeed, A. S.
Affiliations
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
Corresponding author
AL-Shudeifat, Mohammad A.
Venue
Meccanica
Published
2020-06-16
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
735-752
ISSN
  • 0025-6455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9648
OpenAlex
W3036386085
Cited by
64
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Meccanica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
Keywords
nonlinear energy sink, coefficient of restitution, vibration suppression, targeted energy transfer, nonlinear vibration absorber, impulsive loading, structural vibration control, performance optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review