Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,008

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A LOGIC FOR UNCERTAIN PROBABILITIES

JØSANG, AUDUN·2001·International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems

Abstract

We first describe a metric for uncertain probabilities called opinion, and subsequently a set of logical operators that can be used for logical reasoning with uncertain propositions. This framework which is called subjective logic uses elements from the Dempster-Shafer belief theory and we show that it is compatible with binary logic and probability calculus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218488501000831

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,008

Metadata

Authors
JØSANG, A.
Venue
International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems
Published
2001-06
Volume
09
Issue
03
Pages
279-311
ISSN
  • 0218-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6411
OpenAlex
W2110689325
Cited by
1,008
References
0
FWCI
18.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A LOGIC FOR UNCERTAIN PROBABILITIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0218488501000831
The paper
JØSANG, A. (2001). A LOGIC FOR UNCERTAIN PROBABILITIES. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218488501000831

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.