Cited by 287Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferencePhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

INFORMATION FLOWS IN CAUSAL NETWORKS

Open access
AY, NIHAT, POLANI, DANIEL·2008·Advances in Complex Systems

Abstract

We use a notion of causal independence based on intervention, which is a fundamental concept of the theory of causal networks, to define a measure for the strength of a causal effect. We call this measure "information flow" and compare it with known information flow measures such as transfer entropy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0219525908001465

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ay N., Theor. Biosci., 125, 93
  2. H. B. Barlow, Sensory Communication: Contributions to the Symposium on Principles of Sensory Communication, ed. W. A. Rosenblith (M.I.T. Press, 1959) pp. 217–234.
  3. R. Der, U. Steinmetz and F. Pasemann, Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control, and Automation, Concurrent Systems Engineering Series 55, ed. M. Mohammadian (IOS Press, 1999) pp. 43–47.
  4. McGill W., IEEE Trans. Infor. Theor., 4, 93
  5. Porr B., Constr. Foundations, 1
  6. A. Werner, Karst Waters & Environmental Impacts, eds. Günay and Johnson (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1997) pp. 153–160.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
AY, N., & POLANI, D.
Affiliations
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Venue
Advances in Complex Systems
Published
2008-02
Volume
11
Issue
01
Pages
17-41
ISSN
  • 0219-5259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6802
OpenAlex
W2060841334
Cited by
287
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Complex Systems (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Santa Fe Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Keywords
information flow, causal networks, causal independence, intervention, transfer entropy, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review