The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ZERO-MOMENT POINT — THIRTY FIVE YEARS OF ITS LIFE
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the permanence of the concept of Zero-Moment Point, widely-known by the acronym ZMP. Thirty-five years have elapsed since its implicit presentation (actually before being named ZMP) to the scientific community and thirty-three years since it was explicitly introduced and clearly elaborated, initially in the leading journals published in English. Its first practical demonstration took place in Japan in 1984, at Waseda University, Laboratory of Ichiro Kato, in the first dynamically balanced robot WL-10RD of the robotic family WABOT. The paper gives an in-depth discussion of source results concerning ZMP, paying particular attention to some delicate issues that may lead to confusion if this method is applied in a mechanistic manner onto irregular cases of artificial gait, i.e. in the case of loss of dynamic balance of a humanoid robot. After a short survey of the history of the origin of ZMP a very detailed elaboration of ZMP notion is given, with a special review concerning "boundary cases" when the ZMP is close to the edge of the support polygon and "fictious cases" when the ZMP should be outside the support polygon. In addition, the difference between ZMP and the center of pressure is pointed out. Finally, some unresolved or insufficiently treated phenomena that may yield a significant improvement in robot performance are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hierarchical motor control in mammals and machines
Merel, J., Botvinick, M., & Wayne, G. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13239-6 · Cited by 274
Feedback Control of a Cassie Bipedal Robot: Walking, Standing, and Riding a Segway
Gong, Y., Hartley, R., Da, X., Hereid, A., Harib, O., Huang, J.-K., & Grizzle, J. (2019) · 2019 American Control Conference (ACC) · doi:10.23919/acc.2019.8814833 · Cited by 221
Reinforcement Learning for Robust Parameterized Locomotion Control of Bipedal Robots
Li, Z., Cheng, X., Peng, X. B., Abbeel, P., Levine, S., Berseth, G., & Sreenath, K. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra48506.2021.9560769 · Cited by 219
Dynamic Locomotion Through Online Nonlinear Motion Optimization for Quadrupedal Robots
Bellicoso, C. D., Jenelten, F., Gehring, C., & Hutter, M. (2018) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2794620 · Cited by 206
Ensemble-CIO: Full-body dynamic motion planning that transfers to physical humanoids
Mordatch, I., Lowrey, K., & Todorov, E. (2015) · 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2015.7354126 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- VUKOBRATOVIĆ, M., & BOROVAC, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Humanoid Robotics
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 01
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 157-173
- ISSN
- 0219-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1793-6942
- OpenAlex
- W2037729465
- Cited by
- 2,038
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ZERO-MOMENT POINT — THIRTY FIVE YEARS OF ITS LIFE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0219843604000083
- The paper
- VUKOBRATOVIĆ, M., & BOROVAC, B. (2004). ZERO-MOMENT POINT — THIRTY FIVE YEARS OF ITS LIFE. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219843604000083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.