Cited by 221Robotic Locomotion and ControlControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Feedback Control of a Cassie Bipedal Robot: Walking, Standing, and Riding a Segway

Open access
Gong, Yukai, Hartley, Ross, Da, Xingye, Hereid, Ayonga, Harib, Omar, Huang, Jiunn-Kai, Grizzle, Jessy·2019·2019 American Control Conference (ACC)

Abstract

The Cassie bipedal robot designed by Agility Robotics is providing academics with a common platform for sharing and comparing algorithms for locomotion, perception, and navigation. This paper focuses on feedback control for standing and walking using the methods of virtual constraints and gait libraries. The designed controller was implemented six weeks after the robot arrived at the University of Michigan and allowed it to stand in place as well as walk over sidewalks, grass, snow, sand, and burning brush. The controller for standing also enables the robot to ride a Segway. Software supporting the work in this paper is available on GitHub.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23919/acc.2019.8814833

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To date, no published work has demonstrated dynamic locomotion in diverse, challenging natural environments as shown in Fig. 1.

    “To date, no published work has demonstrated dynamic locomotion in diverse, challenging natural environments as shown in Fig. 1.”

    From Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain (2020) · cites this paper as [5]

  • Conventional controllers for legged locomotion are based on elaborate state machines that explicitly trigger the execution of motion primitives and reflexes.

    “Many rely on elaborate state machines that coordinate the execution of motion primitives and reflex controllers [1-5].”

    From Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain (2020) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 2018, Cassie Blue and Associated Press
  2. 2018, Cassie Blue at the UM Dental School
  3. 2018, Cassie Blue Hones Her Segway Riding Skills
  4. 2018, Cassie Blue Plays in the Sand
  5. 2018, Cassie Blue Summary Video
  6. 2018, Cassie Blue Walks Through Fire
  7. 2019, Cassie’s Polar Vortex Original Record
  8. 2019, Feedback Controller for a Cassie Robot
  9. Hartley, 2017, Cassie URDF and FROST Model
  10. 10.1115/DSCC2015-9899 · DOI
  11. 2018, Cassie Simulators
  12. Schepelmann, 2018, Experimental evaluation of robust swing-leg placement controls in robotic limb testbeds

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gong, Y., Hartley, R., Da, X., Hereid, A., Harib, O., Huang, J.-K., & Grizzle, J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
2019 American Control Conference (ACC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-07
Pages
4559-4566
ISSN
0743-1619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972798201
Cited by
221
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
53.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1525006)
  • Toyota Research Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
feedback control, virtual constraints, bipedal walking, legged locomotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review