Cited by 219Robotic Locomotion and ControlReinforcement Learning in RoboticsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Reinforcement Learning for Robust Parameterized Locomotion Control of Bipedal Robots

Open access
Li, Zhongyu, Cheng, Xuxin, Peng, Xue Bin, Abbeel, Pieter, Levine, Sergey, Berseth, Glen, Sreenath, Koushil·2021·2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Developing robust walking controllers for bipedal robots is a challenging endeavor. Traditional model-based locomotion controllers require simplifying assumptions and careful modelling; any small errors can result in unstable control. To address these challenges for bipedal locomotion, we present a model-free reinforcement learning framework for training robust locomotion policies in simulation, which can then be transferred to a real bipedal Cassie robot. To facilitate sim-to-real transfer, domain randomization is used to encourage the policies to learn behaviors that are robust across variations in system dynamics. The learned policies enable Cassie to perform a set of diverse and dynamic behaviors, while also being more robust than traditional controllers and prior learning-based methods that use residual control. We demonstrate this on versatile walking behaviors such as tracking a target walking velocity, walking height, and turning yaw. (Video1)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra48506.2021.9560769

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Robots still struggle to solve high-level tasks such as locomotion, autonomous driving and dexterous manipulation, even though low-level controllers and motion planning algorithms are robust enough to drive joints and end-effectors to desired configurations.

    “Even though low-level controllers and motion planning algorithms are robust enough to drive the joints and end-effectors to reach their desired configuration, robots still struggle to solve high-level tasks, such as locomotion [3], autonomous driving [4] and dexterous manipulation [5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., Cheng, X., Peng, X. B., Abbeel, P., Levine, S., Berseth, G., & Sreenath, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-05-30
Pages
2811-2817
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206620955
Cited by
219
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 7
FWCI
67.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
bipedalism, Cassie robot, reinforcement learning, sim-to-real transfer, domain randomization, walking control, model-free control, speed tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review