Business model patterns for disruptive technologies
Abstract
Companies nowadays face a myriad of business opportunities as a direct consequence of manifold disruptive technology developments. As a basic characteristic, disruptive technologies lead to a severe shift in value-creation networks giving rise to new market segments. One of the key challenges is to anticipate the business logics within these nascent and formerly unknown markets. Business model patterns promise to tackle this challenge. They can be interpreted as proven business model elements, which reveal valuable insights about pursued business logics. The approach in general helps increasing efficiency in business models design processes, but especially lacks methodological support so far. The paper at hand, therefore presents a methodology for pattern-based business model design simplifying development and analysis of business models for disruptive technologies. The methodology has been validated within several industrial projects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing works lack clarity about the combination of multiple patterns, which is necessary for complete design.
“Lastly, they lack clarity about the combination of multiple patterns, which is necessary to the complete design since a pattern usually addresses different parts or elements of the business model [24,44].”
From Configuring New Business Models for Circular Economy through Product–Service Systems (2019) · cites this paper as [24]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 40 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- AMSHOFF, B., DÜLME, C., ECHTERFELD, J., & GAUSEMEIER, J.
- Affiliations
- Paderborn University (DE)
- Venue
- International Journal of Innovation Management
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt
- Published
- 2015-05-27
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 1540002
- ISSN
- 1363-9196 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-5877
- OpenAlex
- W1871987239
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 20.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
- Keywords
- business model patterns, business model design, disruptive technologies, value creation networks, new market segments, business logic, industrial projects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
