The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accounting for biological aggregation in heating and imaging of magnetic nanoparticles
Abstract
Aggregation is a known consequence of nanoparticle use in biology and medicine; however, nanoparticle characterization is typically performed under the pretext of well-dispersed, aqueous conditions. Here, we systematically characterize the effects of aggregation on the alternating magnetic field induced heating and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performance of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) in non-ideal biological systems. Specifically, the behavior of IONP aggregates composed of ~ 10 nm primary particles, but with aggregate hydrodynamic sizes ranging from 50 nm to 700 nm, was characterized in phosphate buffered saline and fetal bovine serum suspensions, as well as in gels and cells. We demonstrate up to a 50% reduction in heating, linked to the extent of aggregation. To quantify aggregate morphology, we used a combination of hydrodynamic radii distribution, intrinsic viscosity, and electron microscopy measurements to describe the aggregates as quasifractal entities with fractal dimensions in the 1.8–2.0 range. Importantly, we are able to correlate the observed decrease in magnetic field induced heating with a corresponding decrease in longitudinal relaxation rate (R 1) in MR imaging, irrespective of the extent of aggregation. Finally, we show in vivo proof-of-principle use of this powerful new imaging method, providing a critical tool for predicting heating in clinical cancer hyperthermia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Notably, nanowarming rates are not dependent on system size or boundary conditions since the RF frequencies used penetrate tissues without attenuation14–16.”
From Vitrification and nanowarming enable long-term organ cryopreservation and life-sustaining kidney transplantation in a rat model (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Walkey, C. D., & Chan, W. C. W. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15233e · Cited by 1,758
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- 10.1038/74464 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00775-004-0560-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.018 · DOI
- M. L. Etheridge, A. Jordan and J. C. Bischof, Phys. Therm. Ther 17 (CRC Press, 2012) pp. 1–25.
- 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.05.014 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.22378 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.24831 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.25181 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-8853(96)00070-4 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.024410 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.072 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.070 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.039 · DOI
- 10.1088/0957-4484/20/39/395103 · DOI
- 10.1088/0022-3727/43/47/474010 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3488881 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp1118234 · DOI
- Dutz S., 2012, J. Nano- Electron. Phys., 4, 02010
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.045435 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep01652 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10439-012-0633-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jcis.2000.7027 · DOI
- 10.1364/AO.30.004859 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00026-9 · DOI
- Friedlander S. K., 2000, Smoke, Dust, and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics
- 10.3109/02656739309061478 · DOI
- 10.1109/20.718537 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00706-0 · DOI
- 10.1088/0957-4484/21/1/015706 · DOI
- 10.1118/1.1748629 · DOI
- Pettaway C. A., 1996, Clin. Cancer Res., 2, 1627
- 10.1002/mrm.10418 · DOI
- 10.1148/radiol.2451061345 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.1910070104 · DOI
- 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0676 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac60289a016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2004.03.049 · DOI
- 10.1021/la701100r · DOI
- 10.1007/3-540-26523-6_3 · DOI
- 10.1021/es0518068 · DOI
- 10.1021/la063744k · DOI
- 10.1088/0957-4484/19/26/265102 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11051-011-0548-z · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.49.5319 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3617251 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.061401 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11051-011-0645-z · DOI
- 10.3109/02656739009141144 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.11.168 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.11.011 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMAG.2007.894127 · DOI
- 10.1088/1742-6596/187/1/012069 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp912076f · DOI
- 10.1109/TMAG.2012.2224328 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Design of iron oxide-based nanoparticles for MRI and magnetic hyperthermia
Blanco-Andujar, C., Walter, A., Cotin, G., Bordeianu, C., Mertz, D., Felder-Flesch, D., & Begin-Colin, S. (2016) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2016-5001 · Cited by 276
Han, Z., Rao, J. S., Gangwar, L., Namsrai, B.-E., Pasek-Allen, J. L., Etheridge, M. L., Wolf, S. M., Pruett, T. L., Bischof, J. C., & Finger, E. B. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38824-8 · Cited by 173
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Etheridge, M. L., Hurley, K. R., Zhang, J., Jeon, S., Ring, H. L., Hogan, C., Haynes, C. L., Garwood, M., & Bischof, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 Sixth Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
- Venue
- TECHNOLOGY
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 02
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 214-228
- ISSN
- 2339-5478
- 2345-7740
- PMC
- PMC4219565
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review