Cited by 10Relativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

New Equation and Energy-Tensor of a Gravitational Field

Open access
Utiyama, Ryoyu·1984·Progress of Theoretical Physics

Abstract

A new equation for a gravitational field is proposed by following the line of arguments in the current theory of gauge fields. A linear approximation of this field equation which is the fourth order differential equation of the metric field gµν shows that it describes two kinds of particles with finite masses in addition to the familiar massless gravitons. An application to a static case shows that the static potential consists of three parts, 1) Newtonian potential, 2) a repulsive potential with a finite range and 3) an attractive potential with another finite force-range. A very interesting result is obtained from the above-mentioned potential. Namely, it seems quite probable that a point-source can be free from the Schwarzschild singularity, provided that the mass of the source is less than some critical value. The energy-“tensor” of the gravitational field is also investigated. It is shown that the total energy can always be transformed into an integral over a large closed surface owing to the invariant property of the Lagrangian. This feature makes it easy to compute the energy of an isolated system, the magnitude of which coincides with the value derived from the conventional theory of relativity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1143/ptp.72.83

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]R. Utiyama, Phys. Rev. 101 (1956), 1597; Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980), 2207.
  2. [3]H. Nariai, Prog. Theor. Phys. 46 (1971), 433, 776.
  3. [2]R. Utiyama and B. S. DeWitt, J. Math. Phys. 3 (1962), 608.
  4. [7]R. Utiyama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71 (1984), 1116. b) K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980), 866, 883, 1435, 2222; 65 (1981), 525; 66 (1981), 318, 2258.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Utiyama, R.
Venue
Progress of Theoretical Physics
Published
1984-07
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
83-97
ISSN
  • 0033-068X (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-4081
OpenAlex
W1977239023
Cited by
10
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Progress of Theoretical Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Einstein field equations, linearized gravity, massive graviton, Newtonian potential, repulsive potential, Schwarzschild singularity, energy conservation (physics)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review