The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lazy snapping
Abstract
In this paper, we present Lazy Snapping , an interactive image cutout tool. Lazy Snapping separates coarse and fine scale processing, making object specification and detailed adjustment easy . Moreover, Lazy Snapping provides instant visual feedback, snapping the cutout contour to the true object boundary efficiently despite the presence of ambiguous or low contrast edges. Instant feedback is made possible by a novel image segmentation algorithm which combines graph cut with pre-computed over-segmentation. A set of intuitive user interface (UI) tools is designed and implemented to provide flexible control and editing for the users. Usability studies indicate that Lazy Snapping provides a better user experience and produces better segmentation results than the state-of-the-art interactive image cutout tool, Magnetic Lasso in Adobe Photoshop.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Random Walks for Image Segmentation
Grady, L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.233 · Cited by 2,624
Graph Cuts and Efficient N-D Image Segmentation
Boykov, Y., & Funka-Lea, G. (2006) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-006-7934-5 · Cited by 1,910
ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation
Lin, D., Dai, J., Jia, J., He, K., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.344 · Cited by 1,129
Self-citationHoiem, D., Efros, A. A., & Hebert, M. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1073204.1073232 · Cited by 616
Deep Interactive Object Selection
Xu, N., Price, B., Cohen, S., Yang, J., & Huang, T. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.47 · Cited by 460
Interactive Image Segmentation via Backpropagating Refinement Scheme
Jang, W.-D., & Kim, C.-S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00544 · Cited by 234
Western University, Sedig, K., Parsons, P., & Western University (2013) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00055 · Cited by 145
(2013) · Liverpool John Moores University · Cited by 133
Interactive segmentation of image volumes with Live Surface
Armstrong, C. J., Price, B. L., & Barrett, W. A. (2007) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2006.11.015 · Cited by 53
Automatic Segmentation of Unknown Objects, with Application to Baggage Security
Grady, L., Singh, V., Kohlberger, T., Alvino, C., & Bahlmann, C. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_31 · Cited by 18
Abeyrathna, D., Ashaduzzaman, M., Malshe, M., Kalimuthu, J., Gadhamshetty, V., Chundi, P., & Subramaniam, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.996400 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Sun, J., Tang, C.-K., & Shum, H.-Y.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-308
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2294819727
- Cited by
- 1,097
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
