Cited by 460Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Deep Interactive Object Selection

Open access
Xu, Ning, Price, Brian, Cohen, Scott, Yang, Jimei, Huang, Thomas·2016·2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Interactive object selection is a very important research problem and has many applications. Previous algorithms require substantial user interactions to estimate the foreground and background distributions. In this paper, we present a novel deep-learning-based algorithm which has much better understanding of objectness and can reduce user interactions to just a few clicks. Our algorithm transforms user-provided positive and negative clicks into two Euclidean distance maps which are then concatenated with the RGB channels of images to compose (image, user interactions) pairs. We generate many of such pairs by combining several random sampling strategies to model users' click patterns and use them to finetune deep Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs). Finally the output probability maps of our FCN-8s model is integrated with graph cut optimization to refine the boundary segments. Our model is trained on the PASCAL segmentation dataset and evaluated on other datasets with different object classes. Experimental results on both seen and unseen objects demonstrate that our algorithm has a good generalization ability and is superior to all existing interactive object selection approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2016.47

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In [40], a deep interactive object selection method transforms user-provided clicks into euclidean distance maps and concatenates them with the input of FCNs.

    “In [40], a deep interactive object selection method was proposed where user-provided clicks are transformed into euclidean distance maps and then concatenated with the input of FCNs.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, N., Price, B., Cohen, S., Yang, J., & Huang, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Adobe Systems (United States) (US)
Venue
2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-06
Pages
373-381
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2300469113
Cited by
460
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.60
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
click-based segmentation, objectness, fully convolutional network, unseen object generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review