Cited by 375Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization

Early application identification

Open access
Bernaille, Laurent, Teixeira, Renata, Salamatian, Kave·2006·Proceedings of the 2006 ACM CoNEXT conference on - CoNEXT '06

Abstract

The automatic detection of applications associated with network traffic is an essential step for network security and traffic engineering. Unfortunately, simple port-based classification methods are not always efficient and systematic analysis of packet payloads is too slow. Most recent research proposals use flow statistics to classify traffic flows once they are finished, which limit their applicability for online classification. In this paper, we evaluate the feasibility of application identification at the beginning of a TCP connection. Based on an analysis of packet traces collected on eight different networks, we find that it is possible to distinguish the behavior of an application from the observation of the size and the direction of the first few packets of the TCP connection. We apply three techniques to cluster TCP connections: K-Means, Gaussian Mixture Model and spectral clustering. Resulting clusters are used together with assignment and labeling heuristics to design classifiers. We evaluate these classifiers on different packet traces. Our results show that the first four packets of a TCP connection are sufficient to classify known applications with an accuracy over 90% and to identify new applications as unknown with a probability of 60%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1368436.1368445

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernaille, L., Teixeira, R., & Salamatian, K.
Affiliations
Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie (FR)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM CoNEXT conference on - CoNEXT '06
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
2006
Pages
1
OpenAlex
W2055261595
Cited by
374
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 23
FWCI
19.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
Keywords
application identification, TCP connections, network traffic classification, online classification, Gaussian mixture model, spectral clustering, K-means clustering, packet traces, network security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review