The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physiological indicators for the evaluation of co-located collaborative play
Abstract
Emerging technologies offer new ways of using entertainment technology to foster interactions between players and connect people. Evaluating collaborative entertainment technology is challenging because success is not defined in terms of productivity and performance, but in terms of enjoyment and interaction. Current subjective methods are not sufficiently robust in this context. This paper describes an experiment designed to test the efficacy of physiological measures as evaluators of collaborative entertainment technologies. We found evidence that there is a different physiological response in the body when playing against a computer versus playing against a friend. These physiological results are mirrored in the subjective reports provided by the participants. We provide an initial step towards using physiological responses to objectively evaluate a user’s experience with collaborative entertainment technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
Affect Grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal.
Russell, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.57.3.493 · Cited by 2,068
Boucsein, W. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5093-5 · Cited by 818
Cited by
Mandryk, R. L., & Atkins, M. S. (2007) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.011 · Cited by 538
Self-citationExperience-Driven Procedural Content Generation
Yannakakis, G. N., & Togelius, J. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2011.6 · Cited by 470
Experiences with an AR evaluation test bed: Presence, performance, and physiological measurement
Gandy, M., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Alvarez, C., Eiriksdottir, E., Hilimire, M., Davidson, B., & McLaughlin, A. C. (2010) · 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1109/ismar.2010.5643560 · Cited by 54
Health Care Virtual Communities: Challenges and Opportunities
El Morr, C. (2010) · Handbook of Research on Developments in E-Health and Telemedicine · doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-670-4.ch013 · Cited by 13
Evaluation Frameworks for Health Virtual Communities
El Morr, C., & Eftychiou, L. (2017) · The Digitization of Healthcare · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95173-4_6 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Mandryk, R. L., & Inkpen, K. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2004-11-06
- Pages
- 102-111
- OpenAlex
- W2094136538
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological indicators for the evaluation of co-located collaborative play. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1031607.1031625
- The paper
- Mandryk, R. L., & Inkpen, K. M. (2004). Physiological indicators for the evaluation of co-located collaborative play. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
