The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-testing/correcting for polynomials and for approximate functions
Abstract
The study of self-testing/correcting programs was introduced in [8] in order to allow one to use program P to compute function f without trusting that P works correctly. A self-tester for f estimates the fraction of x for which P (x) = f(x); and a self-corrector for f takes a program that is correct on most inputs and turns it into a program that is correct on every input with high probability 1. Both access P only as a black-box and in some precise way are not allowed to compute the function f. Self-correcting is usually easy when the function has the random self-reducibility property. One class of such functions that has this property is the class of multivariate polynomials over finite fields [4] [12]. We extend this result in two directions. First, we show that polynomials are random self-reducible over more general domains: specifically, over the rationals and over noncommutative rings. Second, we show that one can get self-correctors even when the program satisfies weaker conditions, i.e. when the program has more errors, or when the program behaves in a more adversarial manner by changing the function it computes between successive calls. Self-testing is a much harder task. Previously it was known how to self-test for a few special examples of functions, such as the class of linear functions. We show that one can self-test the whole class of polynomial functions over Zp for prime p.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation
Goldreich, O., Goldwasser, S., & Ron, D. (1998) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/285055.285060 · Cited by 1,020
The computational complexity of linear optics
Aaronson, S., & Arkhipov, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1993636.1993682 · Cited by 874
Raz, R., & Safra, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '97 · doi:10.1145/258533.258641 · Cited by 834
Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems
Blum, M., Luby, M., & Rubinfeld, R. (1993) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(93)90044-w · Cited by 712
Self-citationPseudorandom Generators without the XOR Lemma
Sudan, M., Trevisan, L., & Vadhan, S. (2001) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.2000.1730 · Cited by 393
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gemmell, P., Lipton, R., Rubinfeld, R., Sudan, M., & Wigderson, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '91
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1991
- Pages
- 33-42
- OpenAlex
- W2094878497
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-testing/correcting for polynomials and for approximate functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/103418.103429
- The paper
- Gemmell, P., Lipton, R., Rubinfeld, R., Sudan, M., & Wigderson, A. (1991). Self-testing/correcting for polynomials and for approximate functions. Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '91. https://doi.org/10.1145/103418.103429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.