The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we consider the question of determining whether a function f has property P or is ε-far from any function with property P. A property testing algorithm is given a sample of the value of f on instances drawn according to some distribution. In some cases, it is also allowed to query f on instances of its choice. We study this question for different properties and establish some connections to problems in learning theory and approximation. In particular, we focus our attention on testing graph properties. Given access to a graph G in the form of being able to query whether an edge exists or not between a pair of vertices, we devise algorithms to test whether the underlying graph has properties such as being bipartite, k -Colorable, or having a p -Clique (clique of density p with respect to the vertex set). Our graph property testing algorithms are probabilistic and make assertions that are correct with high probability, while making a number of queries that is independent of the size of the graph. Moreover, the property testing algorithms can be used to efficiently (i.e., in time linear in the number of vertices) construct partitions of the graph that correspond to the property being tested, if it holds for the input graph.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Measure of Asymptotic Efficiency for Tests of a Hypothesis Based on the sum of Observations
Chernoff, H. (1952) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729330 · Cited by 3,550
Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization
Grötschel, M., Lovász, L., & Schrijver, A. (1988) · Algorithms and Combinatorics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-97881-4 · Cited by 3,431
Valiant, L. G. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1968.1972 · Cited by 3,279
On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities
Vapnik, V. N., & Chervonenkis, A. Y. (2015) · Measures of Complexity · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21852-6_3 · Cited by 3,105
On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities
Vapnik, V. N., & Chervonenkis, A. Y. (1971) · Theory of Probability & Its Applications · doi:10.1137/1116025 · Cited by 2,448
Some optimal inapproximability results
Håstad, J. (2001) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/502090.502098 · Cited by 1,902
Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension
Blumer, A., Ehrenfeucht, A., Haussler, D., & Warmuth, M. K. (1989) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/76359.76371 · Cited by 1,839
Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
(2024) · doi:10.1145/3618260 · Cited by 1,730
Fast Probabilistic Algorithms for Verification of Polynomial Identities
Schwartz, J. T. (1980) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/322217.322225 · Cited by 1,701
Clique is hard to approximate within n1−ε
Håstad, J. (1999) · Acta Mathematica · doi:10.1007/bf02392825 · Cited by 1,369
Cited by
The Born supremacy: quantum advantage and training of an Ising Born machine
Coyle, B., Mills, D., Danos, V., & Kashefi, E. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00288-9 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldreich, O., Goldwasser, S., & Ron, D.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 653-750
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W1970630090
- Cited by
- 1,020
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 18.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/285055.285060
- The paper
- Goldreich, O., Goldwasser, S., & Ron, D. (1998). Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/285055.285060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.