I saw this and thought of you: some social uses of camera phones
Abstract
This paper presents aspects of a study into how and why people use camera phones. The study examined people's intentions at the time of image capture and subsequent patterns of use. Motivated by current interest in "picture messaging", we focus on images taken to communicate with absent people and look at how they were actually used. We consider the timeliness of communication and the role of common ground to derive implications for design.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Youngsters appear to take less interest in sharing photographs as objects than in sharing them as experiences.
“youngsters appear to take less interest in sharing photographs as objects than in sharing them as experiences (Kindberg, Spasojevic, Fleck and Sellen, 2005).”
From Digital photography: communication, identity, memory (2008) · cites this paper as Kindberg, Spasojevic, Fleck and Sellen, 2005
Cites
The Ubiquitous Camera: An In-Depth Study of Camera Phone Use
Kindberg, T., Spasojevic, M., Fleck, R., & Sellen, A. (2005) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2005.42 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital photography: communication, identity, memory
van Dijck, J. (2008) · Visual Communication · doi:10.1177/1470357207084865 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Why We Share: A Study of Motivations for Mobile Media Sharing
Goh, D. H.-L., Ang, R. P., Chua, A. Y. K., & Lee, C. S. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04875-3_23 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kindberg, T., Spasojevic, M., Fleck, R., & Sellen, A.
- Affiliations
- Hewlett-Packard (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Hewlett-Packard (United States) (US)
- Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Venue
- CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-04-02
- Pages
- 1545-1548
- OpenAlex
- W2133978535
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- camera phones, common ground, mobile phone design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
