The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Registration of point cloud data from a geometric optimization perspective
Abstract
We propose a framework for pairwise registration of shapes represented by point cloud data (PCD). We assume that the points are sampled from a surface and formulate the problem of aligning two PCDs as a minimization of the squared distance between the underlying surfaces. Local quadratic approximants of the squared distance function are used to develop a linear system whose solution gives the best aligning rigid transform for the given pair of point clouds. The rigid transform is applied and the linear system corresponding to the new orientation is build. This process is iterated until it converges. The point-to-point and the point-to-plane Iterated Closest Point (ICP) algorithms can be treated as special cases in this framework. Our algorithm can align PCDs even when they are placed far apart, and is experimentally found to be more stable than point-to-plane ICP. We analyze the convergence behavior of our algorithm and of point-to-point and point-to-plane ICP under our proposed framework, and derive bounds on their rate of convergence. We compare the stability and convergence properties of our algorithm with other registration algorithms on a variety of scanned data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object modeling by registration of multiple range images
Chen, Y., & Medioni, G. (2002) · Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.1991.132043 · Cited by 1,409
Jost, T., & Hugli, H. (2004) · Fourth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings. · doi:10.1109/im.2003.1240278 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Scan registration for autonomous mining vehicles using 3D‐NDT
Magnusson, M., Lilienthal, A., & Duckett, T. (2007) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20204 · Cited by 771
Registration of 3D Point Clouds and Meshes: A Survey from Rigid to Nonrigid
Tam, G. K. L., Cheng, Z.-Q., Lai, Y.-K., Langbein, F. C., Liu, Y., Marshall, D., Martin, R. R., Sun, X.-F., & Rosin, P. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2012.310 · Cited by 679
4-points congruent sets for robust pairwise surface registration
Aiger, D., Mitra, N. J., & Cohen-Or, D. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1360612.1360684 · Cited by 677
Self-citationNon‐Rigid Registration Under Isometric Deformations
Huang, Q., Adams, B., Wicke, M., & Guibas, L. J. (2008) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01285.x · Cited by 279
Self-citationIntrinsic Shape Matching by Planned Landmark Sampling
Tevs, A., Berner, A., Wand, M., Ihrke, I., & Seidel, H. ‐. (2011) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01879.x · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitra, N. J., Gelfand, N., Pottmann, H., & Guibas, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2004-07-08
- Pages
- 22-31
- OpenAlex
- W2158455546
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Registration of point cloud data from a geometric optimization perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1057432.1057435
- The paper
- Mitra, N. J., Gelfand, N., Pottmann, H., & Guibas, L. (2004). Registration of point cloud data from a geometric optimization perspective. Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing. https://doi.org/10.1145/1057432.1057435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.