Cited by 1243D Shape Modeling and AnalysisAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

A multi-resolution ICP with heuristic closest point search for fast and robust 3D registration of range images

Jost, T., Hugli, H.·2004·Fourth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings.

Abstract

The iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is widely used for the registration of 3D geometric data. One of the main drawbacks of the algorithm is its quadratic time complexity O(N/sup 2/) with the number of points N. Consequently, several methods have been proposed to accelerate the process. We present a new solution for the speeding up of the ICP algorithm and special care is taken to avoid any tradeoff with the quality of the registration. The proposed solution combines a coarse to fine multiresolution approach with the neighbor search algorithm. The multiresolution approach permits to successively improve the registration using finer levels of representation and the neighbor search algorithm speeds up the closest point search by using a heuristic approach. Both multiresolution scheme and neighbor search algorithm main features are presented. Confirming the success of the proposed solution, typical results show that this combination permits to create a very fast ICP algorithm, with a closest point search complexity of O(N), while preserving the matching quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/im.2003.1240278

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • [62] further combines the above with a coarse-to-fine hierarchical search technique. Use of down-sampled data speeds up the first few iterations of ICP; the resolution is gradually increased to obtain more reliable alignment.

    “Hierarchical Approaches: [62] further combines the above with a coarse-to-fine hierarchical search technique.Use of down-sampled data speeds up the first few iterations of ICP; the resolution is gradually increased to obtain more reliable alignment.”
  • [62] gives a fast ICP algorithm based on localization. They restrict the search for a new CPC at each iteration to the local neighborhood of the correspondence in the previous iteration, avoiding a global exhaustive search.

    “Localization: [62] gives a fast ICP algorithm (Section 4.1.1)based on localization.They restrict the search for a new CPC at each iteration to the local neighborhood of the correspondence in the previous iteration, avoiding a global exhaustive search.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jost, T., & Hugli, H.
Affiliations
University of Neuchâtel (CH)
Venue
Fourth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings.
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2004-06-22
Pages
427-433
ISSN
1550-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148440329
Cited by
124
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
18.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM) (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
iterative closest point, 3D registration, depth images, multi-resolution registration, neighbor search, computational complexity reduction, point cloud matching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review