The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies
Abstract
Software development methodologies are constantly evolving due to changing technologies and new demands from users. Today's dynamic business environment has given rise to emergent organizations that continuously adapt their structures, strategies, and policies to suit the new environment [12]. Such organizations need information systems that constantly evolve to meet their changing requirements---but the traditional, plan-driven software development methodologies lack the flexibility to dynamically adjust the development process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cockburn, A. (2001) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno · Cited by 1,858
Agile software development: the business of innovation
Highsmith, J., & Cockburn, A. (2001) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.947100 · Cited by 1,211
Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed
Boehm, B. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24675-6_1 · Cited by 1,173
Agile software development, the people factor
Cockburn, A., & Highsmith, J. (2001) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.963450 · Cited by 1,097
Williams, L., & Tomayko, J. (2002) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1076/csed.12.3.167.8613 · Cited by 910
Get ready for agile methods, with care
Boehm, B. (2002) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.976920 · Cited by 902
Agile Software Development Ecosystems
Highsmith, J. (2002) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 874
Growing systems in emergent organizations
Truex, D. P., Baskerville, R., & Klein, H. (1999) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/310930.310984 · Cited by 424
Revolution or Evolution? A Comparison of Object-Oriented and Structured Systems Development Methods1
Sircar, S., Nerur, S., & Mahapatra, R. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250991 · Cited by 128
Self-citationProduct-Development Practices That Work: How Internet Companies Build Software
MacCormarck, A. (2001) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 114
Cited by
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,668
A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project
Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T., & Dybå, T. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.004 · Cited by 526
Management challenges in creating value from business analytics
Vidgen, R., Shaw, S., & Grant, D. B. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.023 · Cited by 493
Self-Organizing Roles on Agile Software Development Teams
Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2012.30 · Cited by 330
The impact of inadequate customer collaboration on self-organizing Agile teams
Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2011) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.10.009 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., & Mangalaraj, G.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 72-78
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2046216252
- Cited by
- 1,018
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 74.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1060710.1060712
- The paper
- Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., & Mangalaraj, G. (2005). Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1060710.1060712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
