The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,668
Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering
Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003 · Cited by 1,642
Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies
Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., & Mangalaraj, G. (2005) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1060710.1060712 · Cited by 1,018
Agile project management with Scrum: A case study of a Brazilian pharmaceutical company IT project
Azanha, A., Argoud, A. R. T. T., Camargo Junior, J. B. D., & Antoniolli, P. D. (2017) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-06-2016-0054 · Cited by 733
Management Challenges to Implementing Agile Processes in Traditional Development Organizations
Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2005) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2005.129 · Cited by 632
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boehm, B.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2100064951
- Cited by
- 1,173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-24675-6_1
- The paper
- Boehm, B. (2004). Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24675-6_1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
