The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An approach to spacecraft anomaly detection problem using kernel feature space
Abstract
Development of advanced anomaly detection and failure diagnosis technologies for spacecraft is a quite significant issue in the space industry, because the space environment is harsh, distant and uncertain. While several modern approaches based on qualitative reasoning, expert systems, and probabilistic reasoning have been developed recently for this purpose, any of them has a common difficulty in obtaining accurate and complete a priori knowledge on the space systems from human experts. A reasonable alternative to this conventional anomaly detection method is to reuse a vast amount of telemetry data which is multi-dimensional time-series continuously produced from a number of system components in the spacecraft.This paper proposes a novel "knowledge-free" anomaly detection method for spacecraft based on Kernel Feature Space and directional distribution, which constructs a system behavior model from the past normal telemetry data from a set of telemetry data in normal operation and monitors the current system status by checking incoming data with the model.In this method, we regard anomaly phenomena as unexpected changes of causal associations in the spacecraft system, and hypothesize that the significant causal associations inside the system will appear in the form of principal component directions in a high-dimensional non-linear feature space which is constructed by a kernel function and a set of data.We have confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed anomaly detection method by applying it to the telemetry data obtained from a simulator of an orbital transfer vehicle designed to make a rendezvous maneuver with the International Space Station.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An online algorithm for segmenting time series
Keogh, E., Chu, S., Hart, D., & Pazzani, M. (2002) · Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2001.989531 · Cited by 1,149
Cited by
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholding
Hundman, K., Constantinou, V., Laporte, C., Colwell, I., & Soderstrom, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3219845 · Cited by 1,771
Pimentel, M. A. F., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L. (2014) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026 · Cited by 1,649
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Nassif, A. B., Talib, M. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3083060 · Cited by 748
Outlier Detection: Methods, Models, and Classification
Boukerche, A., Zheng, L., & Alfandi, O. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3381028 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Fujimaki, R., Yairi, T., & Machida, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2005-08-21
- Pages
- 401-410
- OpenAlex
- W2091319256
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An approach to spacecraft anomaly detection problem using kernel feature space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1081870.1081917
- The paper
- Fujimaki, R., Yairi, T., & Machida, K. (2005). An approach to spacecraft anomaly detection problem using kernel feature space. Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/1081870.1081917
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.