The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Triggers and barriers to customizing software
Open accessAbstract
One of the properties of a user interface is that it both guides and constrains the patterns of interaction between the user and the software application.Application software is increasingly designed to be "customizable" by the end user, providing specific mechanisms by which users may specify individual preferences about the software and how they will interact with it over multiple sessions.Users may thus encode and preserve their preferred patterns of use.These customizations, together with choices about which applications to use, make up the unique "softswue environment" for each individual.While it is theoretically possible for each user to carefully evaluate and optimize each possible customization option, this study suggests that most people do not.In facfi since time spent customizing is time spent not working, many people do not take advantage of the customization features at all.I studied the customization behaviorof51 users of a Unix software environment, over a period of four months.This paper describes the process by which users decide to customize and examines the factors that irdluence when and how users make those decisions.These findings have implications for both the design of software and the integration of new software into an organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the literature suggests that users are reluctant to customize unless forced to do so [9]”
From A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus (2004) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Previous work had suggested that users do not customize because the mechanisms are difficult to use [9].”
From A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus (2004) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many users do not take advantage of customization features [Mackay, 1991], likely because of complexity inherent in customization.”
From A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software (2007) · cites this paper as Mackay, 1991
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike previous work by Mackay [Mackay, 1991], which showed that users customize very little, the majority of our participants did personalize and they did so according to their function usage.”
From A field evaluation of an adaptable two-interface design for feature-rich software (2007) · cites this paper as Mackay, 1991
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Mackay found that actual customization is minimal because of time, difficulty, and lack of interest [9].”
From A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus (2004) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons
MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lövstrand, L., & Moran, T. (1990) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/97243.97271 · Cited by 401
Twinkling lights and nested loops: distributed problem solving and spreadsheet development
Nardi, B. A., & Miller, J. R. (1991) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/0020-7373(91)90040-e · Cited by 263
Patterns of sharing customizable software
Mackay, W. E. (1990) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/99332.99356 · Cited by 251
Self-citationResearch techniques in human engineering
Chapanis, A. (1959) · Cited by 138
Users and customizable software : a co-adaptive phenomenon
Mackay, W. E. (1990) · Cited by 133
Self-citationAn ethnographic study of distributed problem solving in spreadsheet development
Nardi, B. A., & Miller, J. R. (1990) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/99332.99355 · Cited by 118
Adaptability and Tailorability in NoteCards
Trigg, R. H., Moran, T. P., & Halasz, F. G. (1987) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-70304-0.50117-5 · Cited by 85
Project Athena as a Next Generation Educational Computing System
Champine, G. A., Lerman, S., & Saltzer, J. H. (1989) · Informatik-Fachberichte · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75177-6_3 · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 363
Domain-Expert Users and their Needs of Software DevelopmentPreprint
Costabile, M. F., Fogli, D., Letondal, C., Mussio, P., & Piccinno, A. (2003) · doi:10.13140/2.1.4737.6325 · Cited by 28
Gouveia, R. H. D. F., & Epstein, D. A. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580955 · Cited by 27
Triggering triggers and burying barriers to customizing software
Banovic, N., Chevalier, F., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208666 · Cited by 27
A Longitudinal In-the-Wild Investigation of Design Frictions to Prevent Smartphone Overuse
Haliburton, L., Grüning, D. J., Riedel, F., Schmidt, A., & Terzimehić, N. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642370 · Cited by 29
Mixed‐Initiative Interface Personalization as a Case Study in Usable AI
Bunt, A., Conati, C., & McGrenere, J. (2009) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v30i4.2264 · Cited by 26
Freedom to Personalize My Digital Classroom
Vermette, L., McGrenere, J., Birge, C., Kelly, A., & Chilana, P. K. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300548 · Cited by 25
An intelligent interface for sorting electronic mail
Crawford, E., Kay, J., & McCreath, E. C. (2002) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/502716.502747 · Cited by 25
Experiences with recombinant computing
Edwards, W. K., Newman, M., Sedivy, J. Z., & Smith, T. F. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1502800.1502803 · Cited by 25
More Than WORDs - Collaborative Tailoring of a Word Processor
Kahler, H. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.3217/jucs-007-09-0826 · Cited by 25
Will Code Remain a Relevant User Interface for End-User Programming with Generative AI Models?
Sarkar, A. (2023) · ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (Onward!) · doi:10.1145/3622758.3622882 · Cited by 32
On the need for user-defined fine-grained access control policies for social networking applications
Simpson, A. C. (2008) · doi:10.1145/1461469.1461470 · Cited by 24
Tabard, A., Mackay, W. E., Roussel, N., & Letondal, C. (2007) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240680 · Cited by 23
Self-citationYour Facebook deactivated friend or a cloaked spy
Mahmood, S., & Desmedt, Y. (2012) · IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomw.2012.6197512 · Cited by 22
Toward Affective Handles for Tuning Vibrations
Seifi, H., Chun, M., & MacLean, K. E. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Applied Perception · doi:10.1145/3230645 · Cited by 22
POCKET: A tool for protecting children's privacy online
Bélanger, F., Crossler, R. E., Hiller, J. S., Park, J.-M., & Hsiao, M. S. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.11.010 · Cited by 22
Benford, S., Koleva, B. N., Preston, W., Angus, A., Thorn, E. L., & Glover, K. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173604 · Cited by 22
Supporting unstructured workflow activities in the Bramble ICN system
Blumenthal, R. L., & Nutt, G. J. (1995) · Conference on Organizational Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/224019.224032 · Cited by 22
Understanding the Utility of Rationale in a Mixed-Initiative System for GUI Customization
Bunt, A., McGrenere, J., & Conati, C. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73078-1_18 · Cited by 21
Domino: Exploring Mobile Collaborative Software Adaptation
Bell, M., Hall, M., Chalmers, M., Gray, P., & Brown, B. A. T. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11748625_10 · Cited by 21
A Framework for Interaction-driven User Modeling of Mobile News Reading Behaviour
Constantinides, M., & Dowell, J. D. (2018) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3209219.3209229 · Cited by 19
Task-centric interfaces for feature-rich software
Lafreniere, B. J., Bunt, A., & Terry, M. A. (2014) · Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/2686612.2686620 · Cited by 20
The effect of content customization on learnability and perceived workload
Rivera, D. (2005) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1056808.1057013 · Cited by 20
Supporting Cooperation through Customisation: The Tviews Approach
Wasserschaff, M., & Bentley, R. (1997) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1023/a:1008669529630 · Cited by 20
An analysis of privacy signals on the World Wide Web: Past, present and future
Reay, I., Dick, S., & Miller, J. (2008) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.12.012 · Cited by 19
Awareness and cooperative work: the POLITeam approach
Sohlenkamp, M., Fuchs, L., & Genau, A. (2002) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1997.665659 · Cited by 20
Redesigning the Peer Review Process: A Developmental Theory-in-Action
Sumner, T., Shum, S. B., Wright, M. J., Bonnardel, N., Piolat, A., & Chevalier, A. (2000) · Cited by 19
Digisprudence: Code as Law Rebooted
Diver, L. (2021) · Edinburgh University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781474485340 · Cited by 32
Systems That Adapt to Their Users
Jameson, A., & Gajos, K. Z. (2012) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b11963-ch-19 · Cited by 18
Adaptive and Adaptable Systems: Differentiating and Integrating AI and EUD
Fischer, G. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34433-6_1 · Cited by 17
Russell, D. M. (2016) · International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI) · doi:10.1145/2909132.2933287 · Cited by 17
Loss Aversion and Preferences in Interaction
Quinn, P., & Cockburn, A. (2018) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2018.1433040 · Cited by 19
Analysis of Information Disclosure on a Social Networking Site
Peterson, K., & Siek, K. A. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_28 · Cited by 17
Complementary menus: Combining adaptable and adaptive approaches for menu interface
Park, J., & Han, S. H. (2011) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.010 · Cited by 17
Nikula, U. (2004) · LUTPub (LUT University) · Cited by 17
Dynamic FishEye Information Visualizations
Fairchild, K. M., Serra, L., Hern, N., Hai, L. B., & Leong, A. T. (1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-227748-1.50020-2 · Cited by 17
Online Social Networks: Privacy Threats and Defenses
Mahmood, S. (2013) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0894-9_2 · Cited by 16
Learning from Message Pairs for Automatic Email Answering
Bickel, S., & Scheffer, T. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30115-8_11 · Cited by 15
Using Patterns to Support the Design of Flexible User Interaction
Baranauskas, M. C. C., & Néris, V. P. D. A. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_113 · Cited by 15
Evaluation of a role-based approach for customizing a complex development environment
Findlater, L., McGrenere, J., & Modjeska, D. (2008) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357251 · Cited by 15
Customizing Lotus Notes to Build Software Engineering Tools
Ma, J., Kienle, H. M., Kaminski, P., Weber, A., & Litoiu, M. (2003) · Cited by 15
Exploring the Dimensions of Variability: a Requirements Engineering Perspective.
Liaskos, S., Jiang, L., Lapouchnian, A., Wang, Y., Yu, Y., Leite, J. C. S. D. P., & Mylopoulos, J. (2007) · Cited by 15
Smart Defaults: From Hidden Persuaders to Adaptive HelpersPreprint
Smith, N. C., Goldstein, D. G., & Johnson, E. J. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1116650 · Cited by 14
Vitale, F. M., Chen, J., Odom, W., & McGrenere, J. (2020) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3357236.3395457 · Cited by 19
Interaction Pace and User Preferences
Goguey, A., Gutwin, C. A., Chen, Z., Suwanaposee, P., & Cockburn, A. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445772 · Cited by 14
Third Generation Knowledge Management in Action: Relational Practices in Swiss Companies
Meissner, J. O., & Wolf, P. (2008) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09659-9_10 · Cited by 14
Design and implementation of a user-centric swimming performance monitoring tool
Mullane, S. L., Chakravorti, N., Conway, P. P., & West, A. A. (2011) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1177/1754337111405271 · Cited by 16
Online Customization Sharing Ecosystems
Haraty, M., McGrenere, J., & Bunt, A. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998289 · Cited by 14
SETTING ONLINE POLICY WITH SOFTWARE DEFAULTS
Shah, R., & Kesan, J. P. (2008) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180802109097 · Cited by 14
Supporting multiple configuration sources using abstraction
Nosáľ, M., & Porubän, J. (2012) · Open Computer Science · doi:10.2478/s13537-012-0015-7 · Cited by 13
User speech rates and preferences for system speech rates
Dowding, S., Gutwin, C. A., & Cockburn, A. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103222 · Cited by 13
Assessing the usefulness of a visual programming IDE for large-scale automation software
Wiesmayr, B., Zoitl, A., & Rabiser, R. (2023) · Software & Systems Modeling · doi:10.1007/s10270-023-01084-7 · Cited by 13
User Oriented Privacy Model for Social Networks
Alkeinay, N. Y., & Norwawi, N. M. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.666 · Cited by 13
Burnett, M., Myers, B. A., Rosson, M. B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2006) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1125451.1125766 · Cited by 13
Social robot accessories for tailoring and appropriation of social robots
Joshi, S., Kamino, W., & Šabanović, S. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01077-y · Cited by 12
Lottridge, D. M., Chignell, M., & Straus, S. E. (2011) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.005 · Cited by 12
Meluso, J., Johnson, S., & Bagrow, J. P. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/wehsk · Cited by 14
Data Collection in Massively Multiplayer Online Games: Methods, Analytic Obstacles, and Case Studies
Ducheneaut, N., & Yee, N. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4769-5_28 · Cited by 11
Wildcard: spreadsheet-driven customization of web applications
Litt, G., & Jackson, D. N. (2020) · International Conference on Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (<Programming>) · doi:10.1145/3397537.3397541 · Cited by 11
Grounding Privacy in Mediated Communication
Romero, N. A., Markopoulos, P., & Greenberg, S. (2012) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9177-z · Cited by 11
Eagan, J., & Stasko, J. (2008) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357324 · Cited by 11
Anticipating Scientific Software Evolution as a Combined Technological and Design Approach
Letondal, C., & Zdun, U. (2003) · Cited by 11
Nudges for Privacy and Security: Understanding and Assisting Userss Choices OnlinePreprint
Acquisti, A., Adjerid, I., Balebako, R., Brandimarte, L., Cranor, L. F., Komanduri, S., Leon, P. G., Sadeh, N., Schaub, F., Sleeper, M., et al. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2859227 · Cited by 17
Guidelines for Privacy-Friendly Default SettingsPreprint
Ausloos, J., Kindt, E. J., Lievens, E., Valcke, P., & Dumortier, J. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2220454 · Cited by 10
Building tailorable hypermedia systems
Grønbæk, K., & Malhotra, J. (1994) · Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications · doi:10.1145/191080.191098 · Cited by 10
An evaluation of advanced user interface customization
Zeidler, C., Lutteroth, C., & Weber, G. (2013) · Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/2541016.2541037 · Cited by 9
Ponsard, A., & McGrenere, J. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858129 · Cited by 9
Agenda- and Activity-Based Triggers for Microlearning
Draxler, F., Brenner, J. M., Eska, M., Schmidt, A., & Chuang, L. L. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3490099.3511133 · Cited by 9
Vermette, L., McGrenere, J., & Chilana, P. K. (2020) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3357236.3395507 · Cited by 9
Gesture modeling for architectural design
Shih, N., & Shih, W.-D. (1996) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/s0097-8493(96)00056-8 · Cited by 9
Karolus, J., Feger, S. S., Schmidt, A., & Woźniak, P. W. (2023) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3563657.3596052 · Cited by 9
Introduction to Human-Computer Interaction
Hornbæk, K., Kristensson, P. O., & Oulasvirta, A. (2025) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192864543.001.0001 · Cited by 13
User Interface Personalization in News Apps.
Constantinides, M., & Dowell, J. D. (2016) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 8
Terzimehić, N., Draxler, F., Ahsanpour, M., & Schmidt, A. (2023) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3603555.3603578 · Cited by 9
Constructing adaptive configuration dialogs using crowd data
Hamidi, S., Andritsos, P., & Liaskos, S. (2014) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/2642937.2642960 · Cited by 8
On the transferability of a meta-design model supporting end-user development
Ardito, C. A., Buono, P., Costabile, M. F., Lanzilotti, R., Piccinno, A., & Zhu, L. (2014) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-013-0339-7 · Cited by 8
Rauber, G., Almeida, V. A. F., & Kumaraguru, P. (2011) · doi:10.5555/3021508.3021528 · Cited by 8
Meng, X., Zhao, S., Huang, Y., Zhang, Z., Eagan, J., & Subramanian, R. (2014) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557349 · Cited by 8
Science Fiction Prototypes as Design Outcome of Research
Kymäläinen, T. (2015) · Cited by 8
The grand challenge: building evolutionary technologies
Rein, G. L., Singh, B., & Knutson, J. (2002) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1993.284160 · Cited by 8
Privacy protection of user profiles in personalized information systems
Parra‐Arnau, J. (2013) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-95312 · Cited by 8
Zhang, Q., Park, S., Muller, M. J., & Karger, D. R. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3633069 · Cited by 7
Reichel, J., Peck, F. C., Inaba, M., Moges, B., Chawla, B. S., & Chetty, M. (2020) · USENIX Security Symposium · Cited by 7
Between Principle and Pragmatism: Reflections on Prototyping Computational Media with Webstrates
Borowski, M., Fog, B. V., Griggio, C. F., Eagan, J., & Klokmose, C. N. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3569895 · Cited by 7
Choices and Decisions of Computer Users
Jameson, A. (2012) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b11963-ch-5 · Cited by 7
Social Network Privacy: Issues and Measurement
Casas, I., Hurtado, J., & Xingquan Zhu, A. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26187-4_44 · Cited by 7
Principles for privacy protection software
Hochheiser, H. (2000) · Computers, Freedom and Privacy · doi:10.1145/332186.332250 · Cited by 7
Krabbel, A., & Wetzel, I. (1998) · Cited by 7
Alves, S., Costa, R., Montague, K., & Guerreiro, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3686985 · Cited by 15
Claimed vs observed information disclosure on social networking sites
Ntlatywa, P., Botha, R. A., & Haskins, B. (2012) · Information Security for South Africa · doi:10.1109/issa.2012.6320443 · Cited by 6
Park, J., & Han, S. H. (2012) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.653325 · Cited by 6
Online Social Network - A Threat to Privacy and Security of Human Society
Krubhala, P., Niranjana, P., & Priya, G. S. (2015) · Cited by 6
Iems: Helping Users Manage Email
McCreath, E. C., & Kay, J. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44963-9_35 · Cited by 6
Social Awareness Support for Cooperation : Design Experience and Theoretical Models
Sandor, O. (2010) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 6
Rule based framework for intelligent GUI adaptation
Paskalev, P., & Serafimova, I. (2011) · International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (CompSysTech) · doi:10.1145/2023607.2023626 · Cited by 6
Acquiring and reasoning about variability in goal models
Liaskos, S. (2008) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 6
Zoubir, M., Gruner, M., Heidinger, J., Schwarz, B., Jetter, H.-C., & Franke, T. (2025) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104518 · Cited by 4
Alsayahani, H., Alhamadi, M., Harper, S., & Vigo, M. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3708359.3712120 · Cited by 6
Leveraging Large Language Models for Personalized Public Messaging
Das, A. K., Xiong, C., & Mueller, K. D. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3720018 · Cited by 5
Real-World Winds: Micro Challenges to Promote Balance Post Smartphone Overload
Terzimehić, N., Huber, J., Aragon-Hahner, S., & Mayer, S. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642583 · Cited by 6
Ishida, M., Ikematsu, K., & Igarashi, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3698133 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Mackay, W. E.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mackay, Wendy E.
- ORCID
- Mackay, Wendy E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Reaching through technology - CHI '91
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1991
- Pages
- 153-160
- OpenAlex
- W1993302775
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Keywords
- software customization, user preferences, user interface design, user interaction patterns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review