The DOI matches its Crossref record.
E-learning 2.0
Abstract
When we think of learning content today, we probably think of a learning object [https://edtechbooks.org/-nLgm]. Originating in the world of computer-based delivery (CBT) systems, learning objects were depicted as being like lego blocks [https://edtechbooks.org/-gjo] or atoms [https://edtechbooks.org/-pPc], little bits of content that could be put together or organized. Standards bodies have refined the concept of learning objects into a rigorous form [http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12] and have provided specifications on how to sequence and organize these bits of content into courses [https://edtechbooks.org/-CVBg] and package them for delivery [http://www.intrallect.com] as though they were books or training manuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning Analytics: The Emergence of a Discipline
Siemens, G. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213498851 · Cited by 1,284
Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J.-P., & Rampnoux, O. (2011) · Serious Games and Edutainment Applications · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_3 · Cited by 427
(2010) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 320
(2010) · Cited by 241
Ashraf, H., Motlagh, F. G., & Salami, M. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.418 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Downes, S.
- Venue
- eLearn
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 2005
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1535-394X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1485488899
- Cited by
- 953
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 142.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E-learning 2.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1104966.1104968
- The paper
- Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. eLearn. https://doi.org/10.1145/1104966.1104968
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
