The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Connections with multiple congested gateways in packet-switched networks part 1: one-way traffic
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we explore the bias in TCP/IP networks against connections with multiple congested gateways. We consider the interaction between the bias against connections with multiple congested gateways, the bias of the TCP window modification algorithm against connections with longer roundtrip times, and the bias of Drop Tail and Random Drop gateways against bursty traffic. Using simulations and a heuristic analysis, we show that in a network with the window modification algorithm in 4.3 tahoe BSD TCP and with Random Drop or Drop Tail gateways, a longer connection with multiple congested gateways can receive unacceptably low throughput. We show that in a network with no bias against connections with longer roundtrip times and with no bias against bursty traffic, a connection with multiple congested gateways can receive an acceptable level of throughput.We discuss the application of several current measures of fairness to networks with multiple congested gateways, and show that different measures of fairness have quite different implications. One view is that each connection should receive the same throughput in bytes/second, regardless of roundtrip times or numbers of congested gateways. Another view is that each connection should receive the same share of the network's scarce congested resources. In general, we believe that the fairness criteria for connections with multiple congested gateways requires further consideration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance
Floyd, S., & Jacobson, V. (1993) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/90.251892 · Cited by 6,290
Self-citationPromoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the Internet
Floyd, S., & Fall, K. (1999) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/90.793002 · Cited by 1,646
Self-citationRecommendations on Queue Management and Congestion Avoidance in the Internet
Braden, B., Clark, D., Crowcroft, J., Davie, B., Deering, S., Estrin, D., Floyd, S., Jacobson, V., Minshall, G., Partridge, C., et al. (1998) · doi:10.17487/rfc2309 · Cited by 1,318
Self-citationRAP: An end-to-end rate-based congestion control mechanism for realtime streams in the Internet
Rejaie, R., Handley, M., & Estrin, D. (1999) · IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320) · doi:10.1109/infcom.1999.752152 · Cited by 710
Roughan, M., Sen, S., Spatscheck, O., & Duffield, N. (2004) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement · doi:10.1145/1028788.1028805 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Floyd, S.
- Venue
- ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 30-47
- ISSN
- 0146-4833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993549051
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Connections with multiple congested gateways in packet-switched networks part 1: one-way traffic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/122431.122434
- The paper
- Floyd, S. (1991). Connections with multiple congested gateways in packet-switched networks part 1: one-way traffic. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. https://doi.org/10.1145/122431.122434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.