Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,616

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Process modeling

Open access
Curtis, Bill, Kellner, Marc I., Over, Jim·1992·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Process Modeling raditionally, the modeling of information systems has focused on analyzing data flows and transformations.This modeling accounted only for the organization's data and that portion of its processes that interacted with data.Newer uses of information technology extend computer use beyond transaction processing into communication and coordination.Successfully integrating these systems into the enterprise often requires modeling even the manual organizational processes into which these systems intervene.The following are three such applications: • • • • • • • • ® • • • • ~6

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/130994.130998

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,616

Metadata

Authors
Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I., & Over, J.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
1992-09
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
75-90
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2338335491
Cited by
1,616
References
0
FWCI
91.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Process modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/130994.130998
The paper
Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I., & Over, J. (1992). Process modeling. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/130994.130998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.