The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated process modeling: An ontological evaluation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(05)80064-3 · Cited by 6,455
The Entity Relationship Model — Toward a Unified View of Data
Chen, P. P.-S. (2002) · Software Pioneers · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_18 · Cited by 5,751
The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data
Chen, P. P.-S. (1976) · ACM Transactions on Database Systems · doi:10.1145/320434.320440 · Cited by 4,708
Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-4486 · Cited by 4,378
Petri Net theory and the modeling of systems
(1982) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(82)90066-0 · Cited by 3,609
Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate
Hammer, M. M. (1990) · Cited by 2,908
Petri, C. A. (1962) · Cited by 2,159
Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I., & Over, J. (1992) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/130994.130998 · Cited by 1,616
An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure
Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M. F., & Sheth, A. (1995) · Distributed and Parallel Databases · doi:10.1007/bf01277643 · Cited by 1,530
Anchoring Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations
Wand, Y., & Wang, R. Y. (1996) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/240455.240479 · Cited by 1,479
Cited by
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021385 · Cited by 1,050
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049 · Cited by 646
Lamont, R. A., Swift, H. J., & Abrams, D. (2015) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0038586 · Cited by 583
ERP integration in a healthcare environment: a case study
Stefanou, C. J., & Revanoglou, A. (2006) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/17410390610636913 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, P., & Rosemann, M.
- Venue
- Information Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 73-87
- ISSN
- 0306-4379 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062844155
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated process modeling: An ontological evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0306-4379(00)00010-7
- The paper
- Green, P., & Rosemann, M. (2000). Integrated process modeling: An ontological evaluation. Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4379(00)00010-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
