Cited by 12Disability Education and EmploymentDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesTeaching and Learning Programming

Helping him see: guiding a visually impaired student through the computer science curriculum

Califf, Mary Elaine, Goodwin, Mary M., Brownell, Jake·2008·Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education

Abstract

In this paper, we describe some of the challenges of teaching computer science to a visually impaired student along with suggested solutions for these challenges. We include perspectives of both professors and a severely visually impaired student.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1352135.1352286

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Califf, M. E., Goodwin, M. M., & Brownell, J.
Affiliations
Illinois State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Publisher
ACM
Published
2008-03-12
Pages
444-448
OpenAlex
W2058741558
Cited by
12
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
Keywords
visually impaired students, computer science education, accessibility, assistive technology, educational challenges, student perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review